Skip to main content

iRubric: Debate Owl or pancake position rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Debate Owl or pancake position 
Students are on debate team. Each team will gather information to support their claims in regard to their position
Rubric Code: JB2XW
By veidson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Debate for Owls or pancake house
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Information given

Poor

Information given had at least one main point, but was not backed up by any documented proof.
Fair

Information given had at least two main points, and some was backed up by documented proof.
Good

Information given had at least four main points, and backed up by documented proof.
Excellent

Information given had at least six main points, and backed up by documented proof.
Preparedness

Poor

Team had to look back at notes three or more times. Most members contributed to the debate verbally. Team had no visuals.
Fair

Team had to look back at notes more than twice. Most member contributed to the debate verbally. Team had visuals.
Good

Team had to look back at notes less than twice. Each member contributed to the debate verbally at least once. Team had visuals.
Excellent

Team did not have to look back at notes at all. Each member contributed to the debate verbally at least once. Team had visuals.
Story board

Poor

Story Board had only one fact about the position. It had less than two pictures (either drawn or cut out). Less than three members can point out his or her contribution to the board.
Fair

Story Board had at least two facts about the position. It had at least two pictures (either drawn or cut out). Most members can point out his or her contribution to the board.
Good

Story Board had at least fourfacts about the position. It had at least three pictures (either drawn or cut out). Each member can point out his or her contribution to the board.
Excellent

Story Board had at least five facts about the position. It had at least four pictures (either drawn or cut out). Each member can point out his or her contribution to the board.
Ability to refute

Poor

Team members can not refute any of the question that the opposing team gave them. They also had no refute questions for the opposing team.
Fair

Team members can refute at least one of the question that the opposing team gave them. They also had at least one refute questions for the opposing team.
Good

Team members can refute most of the question that the opposing team gave them. They also had four refute questions for the opposing team.
Excellent

Team members can refute any question that the opposing team gave them. They also had five refute questions for the opposing team.
Use of classroom resources

Poor

The team only used one or less resources and made up their evidence.
Fair

The team made use of at least two of the resources listed on the board.
Good

Team made use of at least four of the resources listed on the board.
Excellent

Team made use of all of the classroom resources listed on board.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178