Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Waves Math presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Waves Math presentation
NEWS FLASH! Waves Presentation
Students will create a presentation looking at waves from the viewpoint of a mathematician.
Rubric Code:
J9WWA3
By
sterou70
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Poor
4 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Great
10 pts
Excellent
12 pts
Content Completeness
Poor
The basic content required for student understanding is not presented.
Fair
Some of the basic content is presented, but much needed information is left out.
Good
The basic content is presented, and most of the listed points are fully explained.
Great
All listed points are fully explained, but no extra material is presented.
Excellent
All listed points are fully explained. Extra information is presented to expand on the required material.
Content Accuracy
Poor
The material must be retaught by the instructor. The presented material is completely insufficient to give students an appropriate level of understanding.
Fair
Some accurate material is presented. The instructor must spend significant time reteaching certain concepts.
Good
Most presented material is accurate. The presenters need a reasonable amount of direction from the instructor to clarify some points.
Great
Most presented material is accurate. Only a few clarifying points from the instructor are required.
Excellent
All presented material is 100% accurate. No clarification is required from the instructor.
Visual Aides
Poor
Virtually no visual aides are present. Visual aides referenced by the presenters are of little use to the student audience.
Fair
Very few visual aides are present. Those that are used contribute somewhat to student understanding.
Good
Visual aides are present and useful during parts of the presentation. Some aides are not referenced, and some may serve to confuse the student audience.
Great
Visual aides are used through most of the presentation, and are mostly relevant. These aides significantly increase student understanding.
Excellent
Relevant visual aides are used throughout the presentation. Presenters make appropriate reference to these aides, which significantly increase student understanding.
Demonstrations
Poor
No INTERACTIVE/MOVING demonstrations are presented.
Fair
At least one INTERACTIVE/MOVING demonstration is presented.
Good
At least three INTERACTIVE/MOVING demonstrations are presented, though they may not be well explained. Other demonstration criterion are not met.
Great
At least three INTERACTIVE/MOVING demonstrations are presented and partially explained.
Excellent
At least three INTERACTIVE/MOVING demonstrations are presented and fully explained.
Presentation Flow
Poor
There is no flow in the presentations. Transitions are few and ineffective. The audience is not engaged/involved.
Fair
There is little flow in the presentation. Transitions are awkward, and the audience is not engaged/involved.
Good
The presentation flows passably between presenters and topics. The presentation is somewhat dynamic.
Great
The presentation flows well between presenters, who are all involved. The presentation is somewhat dynamic. Transitions are effective.
Excellent
The presentation flows well between presenters, who are all involved. The presentation is dynamic and somewhat interactive. Transitions are very effective.
Ability to Field Questions
Poor
Presenters are unable to field instructor/student questions. The presentation team appears to have no more than a basic understanding of their assigned topic.
Fair
Presenters have considerable difficulty in fielding instructor/student questions. The presentation team requires significant instructor guidance in coming up with answers.
Good
Presenters have some difficulty in fielding instructor/student questions. Some members of the presentation team are unable to answer questions without assistance.
Great
Presenters show little difficulty in fielding instructor/student questions. Each member of the presentation team appears to have an understanding of the material.
Excellent
Presenters show no difficulty in fielding instructor/student questions appropriately. Each member of the presentation team appears to have a good understanding of the material.
Research Time
Poor
Presenters do little to no work in class. Even with significant prompting from the instructor, they are unable to stay on task.
Fair
Presenters do not spend class time wisely. They require significant prompting from the instructor to stay on task, and become a distraction when they are finished.
Good
Presenters spend class time somewhat wisely. They work efficiently when prompted by the instructor. If they finish early, presenters need some prompting to keep them from distracting others.
Great
Presenters spend class time wisely. They require minimal instructor prompting to work appropriately. If they finish early, presenters are not much of a distraction to others.
Excellent
Presenters spend class time wisely. They require no instructor prompting to work appropriately. If they finish early, presenters occupy themselves and do not become a distraction to others.
Personal Responsibility
Poor
The individual student does not contribute to the presentation team, either during the presentation or during research time.
Fair
The individual student appears to be a hindrance to the presentation, and does little to help the presentation team during research time.
Good
The individual student is not very involved in the presentation, or appears to be relatively uninvolved during research time.
Great
The individual student is only somewhat involved in the presentation, or is an occasional distraction during research time.
Excellent
The individual student is actively involved in the presentation and appears knowledgeable about the presented topic. The student pulls his/her weight during research time, and is not a distraction for the presentation team.
Presentation Time
Poor
Presentation is more than 3 minutes too long or short.
Fair
Presentation is no more than 3 minutes too long or short.
Good
Presentation is no more than 2 minutes too long or short.
Great
Presentation is no more than one minute too long or short.
Excellent
Presentation is between 4 minutes, 30 seconds and 5 minutes, 30 seconds long.
Subjects:
Physics
Science
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Physics rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.