Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Fair Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Fair Project
Science Fair Project
Rubric to assess student work and completion of science fair project
Rubric Code:
J7XC99
By
pricsco
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Science Fair Project Points
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Outstanding
4 pts
Concept
Poor
Student seems to be confused about purpose of project.
Fair
Student has a workable idea for the project but does not follow through the steps completely.
Good
Student has a good working idea for the project and followed all steps in order.
Outstanding
Student implements a creative idea for the project and follows all steps with success and develops a product and display.
Hypothesis
Poor
Hypothesis is unrelated to the purpose of the project. It is not tested throughout the project.
Fair
Hypothesis is stated correctly, but does not correlate to the purpose of the project and is not testable.
Good
Hypothesis correlates to the purpose but is not testable.
Outstanding
Hypothesis is testable and directly correlates to the purpose. Hypothesis is also stated correctly and is followed through with the conclusion.
Experiment
Poor
Student did not use appropiate materials and incorrectly stated the procedure so that anyone wishing to do the experiment gets varied results.
Fair
Student used appropiate materials and stated the procedure so that anyone wishing to do the experiment can perform it but must guess what to do at more than 2 steps.
Good
Student used appropiate materials and stated the procedure so that anyone wishing to do the experiment can perform it but must guess what to do at 1-2 steps.
Outstanding
Student used appropiate materials and correctly stated the procedure so that anyone wishing to do the experiment can perform it and get the same results. Multiple trials were also performed.
Analysis (data)
Poor
It is unclear what the data represents without referring to the written results.
Fair
Results must be referenced (more than twice) to gain an understanding of the data.
Good
Results must be referenced (at least once) to gain an understanding of the data.
Outstanding
Data is understood without having to read the results to figure out what happened.
Research/Bibliography
Poor
Research does not help the student form a testable hypothesis and does not add to the student's prior knowledge.
Fair
Research helps the student form a testable hypothesis but does not add to the student's prior knowledge.
Good
Research helps the student form a hypothesis (maybe not testable) and gives the student knowledge that may or may not have been known.
Outstanding
Research helps the student form a testable hypothesis and gives the student knowledge about the experiment not previously known. Bibliography is complete.
Conclusion
Poor
Student neither explains the results of the experiment nor tells if the hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Fair
Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Good
Student explains the results of the project but leaves some question about what was supposed to happen and what actually did. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Outstanding
Student clearly explains the results of the project and draws a difference between what was supposed to happen and what actually did. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect. Student exemplifies complete understanding of the scientific process.
Display Board/Materials
Poor
Board is not neat and seems haphazardly thrown together. Steps from the scientific process may or may not be out of order.
Fair
Board is decorated nicely. More than two steps of the scientific process is out of order. /Materials are missing a few things that could add to the accuracy of the experiment.
Good
Board is decorated nicely and neatly. One to two steps of the scientific process is out of order. Materials are appropiate for the experiment
Outstanding
Board is decorated nicely and neatly. The decoration draws a viewer to the board and keeps their attention. Scientific process is in correct order. Materials were well thought out.
Question and Answer
Poor
Student does not answer questions presented by others regarding project in an informative and knowledgeable manner.
Fair
Student answers questions with little to basic knowledge of project and is difficult to understand.
Good
Student answers some questions with basic to good knowledge of project
Outstanding
Student answers all questions knowledgeably with a great understanding of topic and with research to back up claims. Student's answers are easy to understand.
Keywords:
science fair
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.