Skip to main content

iRubric: Individual Portfolio - Reflections rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Individual Portfolio - Reflections 
This is an assessment of a writing portfolio that students will have created over the entire semester. Each individual assignment will have already been marked so this is an assessment of the portfolio as a whole. Both the teacher and the group members will mark the portfolio according to this rubric.
Rubric Code: J7A76W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Writing Portfolio
  Excellent

7 pts

Good

5 pts

Fair

2 pts

Minimal work done

0 pts

GROUP/INSTRUCTOR'S MARK

8 pts

LAYOUT

Excellent

Design is very attractive and shows great creativity.
Consistent format extends from page-to-page; portfolio design is intentional.
The portfolio demonstrates careful thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out so as not to waste space or appear too crowded.
Good

Design is attractive and shows some creativity.
Some inconsistencies in format page-to-page; portfolio design appears intentional
The portfolio demonstrates some thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out with some wasted space or appear somewhat crowded.
Fair

Design is somewhat attractive and shows little creativity.
Somewhat consistent format from page-to-page; portfolio design appears fairly random.
The portfolio demonstrates little thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out wasting some space &/or appear crowded.
Minimal work done

Design is unattractive and shows no creativity.
Inconsistent format from page-to-page; portfolio design is random
The portfolio demonstrates no thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out to waste space &/or appear too crowded.
GROUP/INSTRUCTOR'S MARK
Enter Title
  Excellent

6 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

2 pts

Minimal work done

0 pts

MARK

18 pts

PRESENTATION

Excellent

Communicates ideas clearly and with enthusiasm.
Preparation is evident.
Strong evidence of peer-to-peer feedback to each other about their portfolios.
Good

Communicates ideas somewhat clearly and with enthusiasm.
Preparation is somewhat evident.
Some evidence of peer-to-peer feedback to each other about their portfolios.
Fair

Communicates ideas not very clearly and with little enthusiasm.
Preparation is minimally evident.
Little evidence of peer-to-peer feedback to each other about their portfolios.
Minimal work done

Communicates ideas unclearly and with little or no enthusiasm.
Preparation is not evident.
No evidence of peer-to-peer feedback to each other about their portfolios.
MARK
REFLECTIONS

Excellent

All reflections include a detailed description of the activity and a detailed account of all skills learned.
All reflections include personal reactions that are descriptive and insightful.
Reflections are original and specific to the particular topic.
Good

Some reflections include somewhat detailed description of the activity and an account of skills learned.
Reflections include some personal reactions that are descriptive and insightful.
Reflections are somewhat original and specific to the particular topic.
Fair

Reflections include little description of the activity and accounts of skills learned.
Reflections include little personal reactions that are descriptive and insightful.
Reflections are not very original or specific to the particular topic.
Minimal work done

Reflections include minimal or no description of the activity and account of skills learned.
Reflections include no personal reactions or are not descriptive or insightful.
Reflections are unoriginal or unspecific to the particular topic.
MARK
MECHANICS

Excellent

There are very few or no errors in spelling or punctuation.
Work requires little or no editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a good measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Good

There are few errors in spelling or punctuation.
Work requires some editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a fair measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Fair

There are some errors in spelling and punctuation.
Work requires a lot of editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a poor measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Minimal work done

There are many errors in spelling and punctuation.
Work requires significant editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are an inadequate measure of how students met the course learning objectives
MARK
Enter Title
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Minimal work done

0 pts

MARK

4 pts

TEAM WORK

Excellent

Respectful, cooperative, and on-task all of the time.
Strong evidence of peer-to-peer conferencing.
Good

Respectful, cooperative, and on-task most of the time.
Evidence of Peer-to-peer conferencing.
Fair

Respectful, cooperative, and on-task some of the time.
Little evidence of Peer-to-peer conferencing.
Minimal work done

Disrespectful, uncooperative, and/or off-task most of the time.
Little or no evidence of peer-to-peer conferencing.
MARK




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202