Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Brochure of Artist of the Modern Era rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Brochure of Artist of the Modern Era
Sample Brochure Rubric
Rubric for AP Art History class
Rubric Code:
J75459
By
Sorrows
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Category
Outstanding
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Attractiveness and organization
Outstanding
The brochure has exceptionally attractive formatting, excellently organized information that flows well, and is meticulously neat.
Good
The brochure has attractive formatting and well-orgainzed information, with some flow issues.
Fair
The brochure has some attractiveness with some organization issues, but appropriate information.
Little or no effort at neatness.
Poor
The brochure's formatting and organization of material are confusing and work appears messy.
Accuracy of Content
Outstanding
The brochure has all of the required information. (see checklist) and some additonal information.
Good
The brochure has all of the required information. (see checklist).
Fair
The brochure has most of the required information. (see checklist).
Poor
The brochure lacks in the required information. (see checklist).
Graphics/Pictures/Design
Outstanding
The graphics are quite relevant, and there is an excellent balance of text and graphics indicative of professional design qualities.
Good
The graphics are relevant, and there is a good balance of text and graphics but some design qualities could have been enhanced.
Fair
The graphics are marginally relevant; more balance of text and graphics would have enhanced the design qualities.
Poor
The graphics are not relevant and the accompanying text and/or graphics appear to be randomly chosen, distracting from good design qualities.
Research & Sources
Outstanding
Research on display throughout, sources used to effect, examples greatly enhance product, many citations from a variety of sources accurately listed.
Good
Adequate level of research, There are some citations from a variety of sources accurately listed.
Fair
In-depth research is not evident. There are a few citiations accurately listed on the brochure.
Poor
Appears to be guess work. Incomplete citations are listed on the brochure.
Mechanics/Period Terminology
Outstanding
Writing style is professional & language is clear. Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Period terminology is used effectively and appropriately and enhances understanding of the artist & period.
Good
Writing style is mostly professional and language is understandable; contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. Period terminology is used somewhat effectively.
Fair
Writing style is somewhat too casual or language is confusing. Contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Period terminology is used but not effectively and is confusing.
Poor
Writing style lacks refinement and language is confusing. Contains excessive grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Period terminology is not used or used ineffectively confusing the reader.
Representative of Artist & Period
Outstanding
Student makes many connections relating to ideology and history of artist. Text and artworks provide readers with a clearly stated synopsis of the artist's uniqueness and period philosophy.
Good
Student makes clear connections relating to ideology and history of artist. Text and artworks provide readers with some idea of the artist's uniqueness and some of the period philosophy.
Fair
Some connections are made relating to ideology and history of artist. Text and artworks provide readers with a confusing image of the artist's uniqueness and unclear period philosophy.
Poor
Very few or no connections are made relating to ideology and history of artist. Text and artworks do not provide readers with any idea of the artist's uniqueness or period philosophy.
Creativity & Craftmanship
Outstanding
Very creative!
Evidence of thinking outside-the-box.
Evidence of great attention to detail and time spent on assignment.
Good
Indication of student beginning to think outside-the-box.
Work was good, but more attention to detail and time could have enhanced assignment.
Fair
There was some creativity, but more could have been done.
Work was merely adequate. More time spent could have given the product a finished look.
Poor
Student did not get very creative.
Work was poor, sloppy, and showed little attention to detail or time spent on assignment.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.