Skip to main content

iRubric: Final Exam rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Exam 
Final Exam Poetry Comparison Whitman + Eady Whitman + Nye
Rubric Code: J5W647
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Exam  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric 270 Final Exam
  Unacceptable

(N/A)

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Thesis

Unacceptable

The paper does not have a clear and compelling thesis. The thesis does not explain the poets and the comparison between Whitman and Nye/Eady.
Poor

The paper has a poor thesis. The thesis explains the poets and the comparison between Whitman and Nye/Eady in basic terms, without original points of comparison.
Fair

The paper has a basic thesis. The thesis explains the poets and the comparison between Whitman and Nye/Eady in simplistic terms, with few original points of comparison.
Good

The paper has a good thesis. The thesis explains the poets and the comparison between Whitman and Nye/Eady in good terms, with some original points of comparison.
Excellent

The paper has an excellent thesis. The thesis explains the poets and the comparison between Whitman and Nye/Eady in sophisticated terms, with many original points of comparison.
Development and Thematic Discussion

Unacceptable

This paper does not develop the thesis with compelling examples. References to the texts are very slight and do not reflect good reading of the poems to prove the thesis.
Poor

This paper develops the thesis with very few compelling examples. References to the texts are slight and do not reflect good reading of the poems to prove the thesis. The thesis is poorly supported with examples from Whitman and Nye or Eady.
Fair

This paper develops the thesis with some compelling examples. References to the texts are slight and reflect a very basic reading of the poems to prove the thesis. The thesis is not well developed, lacking support from Whitman and Nye or Eady.
Good

This paper develops the thesis with good examples. References to the texts are plentiful and reflect a very good reading of the poems to prove the thesis. The thesis is developed with good support from Whitman and Nye or Eady.
Excellent

This paper develops the thesis with excellent, sophisticated examples. References to the texts are plentiful and reflect an excellent reading of the poems to prove the thesis. The thesis is developed with outstanding support from Whitman and Nye or Eady.
Comparison

Unacceptable

The paper does an unacceptable job of comparing and contrasting Whitman with Eady or Nye.
Poor

The paper does an poor job of comparing and contrasting Whitman with Eady or Nye.
Fair

The paper does a fair job of comparing and contrasting Whitman with Eady or Nye.
Good

The paper does a good job of comparing and contrasting Whitman with Eady or Nye.
Excellent

The paper does an excellent job of comparing and contrasting Whitman with Eady or Nye.
Use of Quotations

Unacceptable

This paper does not make effective use of textual citation.
Poor

This paper either makes use of too many quotations without fully explaining and analyzing them or does not include enough quotations as textual evidence.
Fair

This paper makes satisfactory use of quotations as textual evidence, but additional critical analysis, connecting the evidence to the paper's thesis is needed.
Good

This paper smoothly integrates quotations and analysis in support of the paper's thesis. Additional textual evidence and analysis would add to the paper's overall argument.
Excellent

This paper makes excellent use of quotations as textual evidence. The critical analysis is seamlessly integrated in support of the paper's thesis.
MLA Style

Unacceptable

The paper does not use proper citations or cites incorrectly.
Poor

The paper does not use proper citations consistently or cites incorrectly.
Fair

The paper uses proper citations sporadically.
Good

The paper uses proper citations and cites correctly with only a few minor errors.
Excellent

The paper uses proper citations and cites correctly with no errors.
Grammar & Mechanics

Unacceptable

The paper has so many errors in grammar and mechanics that it lacks fluency.
Poor

This paper has many errors in grammar and mechanics. The paper demonstrates poor control over academic American English.
Fair

This paper has been proofread, however, there are errors in grammar and mechanics.
Good

This paper has been proofread. There are very small errors in grammar and mechanics.
Excellent

This paper has been proofread and is flawless. There are no errors in grammar or mechanics.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178