iRubric: Reflective Journal Extern Course rubric

Response demonstrates a lack of reflection on, or personalization of the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretation are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided

Response demonstrates a minimal reflection on, and personalization of the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment

Response demonstrates a general reflection on, and personalization of the theories, concepts and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.

Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection on, and personalization of the theories, concepts and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.

Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response

Writing is unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response.

Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response.

Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar or syntax errors throughout the response.