Skip to main content
iRubric: EDAD 683 Joint Collaborative Project Proposal rubric

iRubric: EDAD 683 Joint Collaborative Project Proposal rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
EDAD 683 Joint Collaborative Project Proposal 
Ashland Students and Concordia Students are doing a joint proposal for a pilot project to implement a new technology or a new curricular innovation into the classroom/school.
Rubric Code: J5242X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric EDAD 683 Joint Collaborative Projec
Ashland Students and Concordia Students are doing a joint proposal for a pilot project to implement a new technology or a new curricular innovation into the classroom/school.
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Outstanding

4 pts

Introduction and Timeline
1 pts

Did the candidate introduce the project and set forth a time line of events of the proposal? (Personal Statement and Cover Page)

Poor

The candidate failed to introduce the project and set forth a time line of events of the proposal.
Fair

The candidate introduced the project and set forth a time line of events of the proposal in a so-so way. The candidate did not expand on requirements.
Good

The candidate introduced the project and set forth a time line of events of the proposal in an acceptable manner.
Outstanding

The candidate superbly introduced the project and set forth a time line of events of the proposal outstandingly.
Demographic Area Target explained.
1 pts

Does this project discuss what demographics are being targeted? (Special Education, Gifted and Minority Students)

Poor

The candidate failed to discuss what demographics are being targeted.
Fair

The candidate discussed what demographics are being targeted.
Good

The candidate discussed what demographics are being targeted in an acceptable manner.
Outstanding

The candidate superbly discussed what demographics are being targeted and how it will affect all parties involved.
Impact will on school community
1 pts

Does this project discuss what the impact will be on the community, staff and/or students?

Poor

The candidate failed to explain what the impact will be on the community, staff and/or students.
Fair

The candidate discussed what the impact will be on one of the following: the community, staff and/or students.
Good

The candidate discussed what the impact will be on two of the following: the community, staff and/or students.
Outstanding

The candidate superbly discussed and explained what the impact will be on the community, staff and/or students.
How will they assess for success
1 pts

Did the project have a system to assess for student success?

Poor

The candidate failed to have a system to assess for student success.
Fair

The candidate had a system to assess for student success.
Good

The candidate explained the system to assess for student success.
Outstanding

The candidate superbly explained the system to assess for student success.
Enrich the educational process
1 pts

Does the project show how the educational process will be enriched?
(Educational Standards ACTFL, NETS*S and etc.)

Poor

The candidate failed to explain how the educational process will be enriched.
Fair

The candidate displayed how the educational process will be enriched.
Good

The candidate explained how the educational process will be enriched.
Outstanding

The candidate discussed and explained how the educational process will be enriched and follows all standards that need to be met.
Financial Concerns
1 pts

Did the candidate explain the cost to operate this system in detail?

Poor

The candidate failed to explain the cost to operate this system in detail.
Fair

The candidate displayed the cost to operate this system.
Good

The candidate explained the cost to operate this system.
Outstanding

The candidate explained the cost to operate this system in detail.
Appropriate Literature/Research
1 pts

Did the candidate explain in detail different research articles, scientific findings and etc.

Poor

The candidate failed to explain in detail different research articles, scientific findings and etc.
Fair

The candidate displayed different research articles, scientific findings and etc.
Good

The candidate explained different research articles, scientific findings and etc.
Outstanding

The candidate explained in detail different research articles, scientific findings and etc.
Chain of Command
1 pts

Has the candidate discussed the chain of command from the executive down to the student(s)?

Poor

The candidate failed to discuss the chain of command from the executive down to the student(s).
Fair

The candidate discussed the chain of command from the executive down to the student(s).
Good

The candidate explained the chain of command from the executive down to the student(s).
Outstanding

The candidate discussed in detail the chain of command from the executive down to the student(s).
Analysis
1 pts

Did the candidate suggest ways to strengthen, weaken, or differentiate for all parties involved.

Poor

The candidate failed to suggest ways to strengthen, weaken, or differentiate for all parties involved.
Fair

The candidate suggested ways to do one of the following: strengthen, weaken, or differentiate for all some parties involved.
Good

The candidate explained ways to strengthen, weaken, or differentiate for most parties involved.
Outstanding

The candidate suggested ways to strengthen, weaken, or differentiate for all parties involved.
Point Totals for Each Column
Below points will be calculated in each column to display the points received for each category.
Point Totals
1 pts

Points will be added up to see if this proposals has been denied, accepted or more information is needed to make a decision.
0-40% Denied
40.01-80% Needs More Information
80.01-100% Accepted

Poor
Fair
Good
Outstanding



Keywords:
  • Foreign Language, Proposal, Ashland, Concordia

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202