iRubric: Grievance Meeting Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Grievance Meeting Presentation Political Organizing Campaign Plan The student has to demonstrate the skills to investigate, develop theory and advocate for a member in a grievance meeting. Thus, the student will be graded upon his/her oral presentation of a grievance meeting. Rubric Code: J25CXA By swms566 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Oral Presentation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Content 40 points	Poor Presenter did not understand the principles and strategies used in grievance theory development.	Fair Presenter showed a little understanding of the principles and strategies used in grievance theory development.	Good Presented showed a good understanding of the principles and strategies used in grievance theory development.	Excellent Presenter showed an excellent understanding of the principles and strategies used in grievance theory development.
Organization 20 points	Poor Presenter was unorganized in the delivery of the grievance presentation. The flow of the presentation was confusing to follow.	Fair Presenter was organized in the delivery of the grievance presentation. The flow of the presentation was somewhat unclear.	Good Presenter was well organized in the delivery of the grievance presentation. The flow of the presentation was easy to follow.	Excellent Presenter was extremely organized in the delivery of the grievance presentation. The flow of the presentation was clear and concise.
Effort 15 points	Poor The presenter put little to no effort into the grievance presentation.	Fair The presenter put minimal effort in the grievance presentation.	Good The presenter put forth an average amount of effort into the grievance presentation.	Excellent The presenter put forth his/her best effort in the grievance presentation and it was very thorough.
Presentation 25 points	Poor The presenter's presentation was vague and short. Not all of the grievance strategies were covered in the assignment.	Fair The presenter's presentation was fair and covered part of the strategies covered in the assignment.	Good The presenter's presentation was done satisfactory and covered all strategies in the assignment.	Excellent The presenter's presentation was exemplary. All strategies were covered and left no misunderstanding of the grievance objectives.