iRubric: MED 102 Designer Critique Grading Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
MED 102 Designer Critique Grading Rubric Arts Journal Grading Rubric This rubric is for grading MED 102 Designer Critique submissions. Rubric Code: J24B287 By ejcarl9 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Designer Critique Rubric
	EXCELLENT 20 pts	GOOD 16 pts	FAIR 14 pts	POOR 12 pts
Content	EXCELLENT The critique demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of a designer critique. The responses show understanding and insight. All ideas are related to topics and explained well.	GOOD The student has demonstrated a basic understanding of the purpose of a designer critique. Critical thinking is often demonstrated.	FAIR The student has demonstrated some understanding of the purpose of a designer critique but not yet demonstrated a full understanding. Some attempt at critical thinking is demonstrated.	POOR The student has not demonstrated an understanding of the purpose of a designer critique. Some attempt has been made but critical thinking has not been demonstrated.
Creativity	EXCELLENT The student has demonstrated thought process/theme building/ideas/technique.	GOOD The student has demonstrated a basic use of thought process/ theme building/ideas/technique.	FAIR The student has demonstrated the use of some elements of thought process/theme building/ideas and technique but needs more work to demonstrate full understanding.	POOR The student has not demonstrated the use of thought process/theme/building/ideas and technique in the critique.
Artistic Interpretation	EXCELLENT Writing is fluent and lively. Shows a good understanding of the use of symbolism and expression.	GOOD Writing is fluent, but not lively. Shows some understanding of the use of symbolism and expression.	FAIR Writing is not organized completely. Shows a little understanding of the use of symbolism and expression.	POOR Writing is not organized. Shows no understanding of the use of symbolism and expression.
Design language and concepts	EXCELLENT The student has demonstrated a full understanding of design language and concepts.	GOOD The student has demonstrated some understanding of design language and concepts.	FAIR The student has not fully demonstrated an understanding of design language and concepts.	POOR The student has not demonstrated an understanding of design language and concepts.
Mechanics	EXCELLENT The student used flawless spelling and punctuation. Text was easy to read.	GOOD The student had few or no spelling errors; some minor punctuation mistakes. Text was often easy to read.	FAIR The student had several spelling and punctuation errors. Text was difficult to read.	POOR The student many, over 10, instances of incorrect spelling and punctuation. Text was difficult to read.