Skip to main content
iRubric: CF PA Program PC 002.06 - EBM Literature review rubric

iRubric: CF PA Program PC 002.06 - EBM Literature review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CF PA Program PC 002.06 - EBM Literature review 
CF PA Program PC 002.06 - EBM Literature review
Rubric Code: J249537
By draymanma
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric PC 002.06
  High Distinction

(N/A)

Distinction

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Below standard

(N/A)

Introduction

High Distinction

The introduction is excellent, accurately defines key terms and clearly introduces the argument.

(10 Pts)
Distinction

The introduction is very good, accurately defines key terms and clearly introduces the argument.

(9 Pts)
Good

The introduction is good, accurately defines key terms and introduces the argument.


(8 Pts)
Poor

The introduction is satisfactory, with some attempt to define key terms and introduce the argument.

(7 Pts)
Below standard

The introduction is unsatisfactory. Key terms are not defined and the argument has not been introduced.

(6 Pts)
Understanding of literature

High Distinction

Effective understanding of reading is clearly demonstrated and includes excellent description of the literature.
(20 Pts)
Distinction

Effective understanding of reading is clearly demonstrated and includes a very good description of the literature.
(18 Pts)
Good

An understanding of reading is demonstrated and includes a good description of the literature.

(16 Pts)
Poor

Understanding of the reading is staisfactory and includes some description of the literature.

(14 Pts)
Below standard

Understanding of the reading is unstaisfactory. Inadeauate description of the literature.

(12 Pts)
Developing the argument

High Distinction

Excellent. Clear, coherent and logical argument developed in the main body.



(20 Pts)
Distinction

Very good. Clear, coherent and logical argument developed in the main body.



(18 Pts)
Good

Good attempt to present a clear, coherent and logical argument in the main body.


(16 Pts)
Poor

Satisfactory attempt to present a clear, coherent and logical argument in the main body.


(14 Pts)
Below standard

Unsatisfactory attempt to present a clear, coherent and logical argument in the main body.


(12 Pts)
Critical thinking

High Distinction

Excellent evaluation of reading material demonstrated which includes critical and authentic insights.


(20 Pts)
Distinction

A very good evaluation of reading material demonstrated which includes critical and authentic insights.

(18 Pts)
Good

A good evaluation of reading material demonstrated which includes some critical insight.


(16 Pts)
Poor

Satisfactory evaluation of reading material demonstrated which includes some critical insight.

(14 Pts)
Below standard

Unsatisfactory evaluation of reading material demonstrated. No attempt at critical thinking.

(12 Pts)
Conclusion

High Distinction

Excellent conclusion which summarises the arguments coherently and logically.


(10 Pts)
Distinction

A very good conclusion which summarises the arguments coherently and logically.

(9 Pts)
Good

A good conclusion which summarises the arguments coherently and logically.


(8 Pts)
Poor

Satisfactory conclusion which summarises the arguments.



(7 Pts)
Below standard

Unsatisfactory conclusion which does not summarise the arguments logically.


(6 Pts)
APA style and format

High Distinction

Excellent. Correct APA style conventions applied throughout including in-text citations, quotations, references and format.
(10 Pts)
Distinction

Very good. Correct APA style conventions applied throughout including in-text citations, quotations, references and format.
(9 Pts)
Good

Good. Correct APA style conventions applied throughout including in-text citations, quotations, references and format.

(8 Pts)
Poor

Satisfactory. Some correct APA style conventions applied including in-text citations, quotations, references and format.

(7 Pts)
Below standard

Unsatisfactory. APA style conventions are not applied.




(6 Pts)
Spelling and Grammar

High Distinction

Excellent Spelling and grammar.
No detectable errors when being read.



(10 Pts)
Distinction

Very Good Spelling and Grammar.
No detectable errors when being read.



(9 Pts)
Good

Good Spelling and Grammar.
No errors in Spelling and Grammar that make it hard to read.


(8 Pts)
Poor

Satisfactory Spelling and Grammar.
Few errors in grammar and spelling that make it hard to read

(7 Pts)
Below standard

Unsatisfactory use of spelling and grammar. Many errors that make the paper hard to read.


(6 Pts)






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60