Skip to main content
iRubric: Chinese Storyboard Presentation- Peer review rubric

iRubric: Chinese Storyboard Presentation- Peer review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Chinese Storyboard Presentation- Peer review 
Chinese Storyboard Presentation- Peer review
This project explores and develops students' understanding of the Chinese New Year celebration with an emphasis on their home countries. Therefore, it helps students to use the Chinese skills which they have learned to share information about the cultural differences and similarities of new year celebrations of different countries around the world. Students also share the environmental impact of these traditional activities and provide eco-friendly solutions.
Rubric Code: J238782
By MuMeiHsueh
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Storyboard Rubric
  Excellent

100 pts

Good

80 pts

Fair

60 pts

Needs Improvement

40 pts

Your Score

(N/A)

Project Content
Content

Excellent

My peer shows understanding of cultural knowledge, and provides all relevant details to a high standard.

Content includes:
- Geographical location.
- Cultural features.
- How do people prepare activities before, during, after.
- The differences and similarities to the Chinese new year.
- The negative environmental impact of this tradition and solutions.
Good

My peer shows some understanding of cultural knowledge, and provides relevant details.

Content includes:
- Geographical location.
- Cultural features.
- How do people prepare activities before, during, after.
- The differences and similarities to the Chinese new year.
- The negative environmental impact of this tradition and solutions.
Fair

My peer shows some understanding of cultural knowledge, but there may be some gaps in detail.

Content includes:
- Geographical location.
- Cultural features.
- How do people prepare activities before, during, after.
- The differences and similarities to the Chinese new year.
- The negative environmental impact of this tradition and solutions.
Needs Improvement

My peer dose not show enough understanding of cultural knowledge, and there are many gaps in detail.

Content includes:
- Geographical location.
- Cultural features.
- How do people prepare activities before, during, after.
- The differences and similarities to the Chinese new year.
- The negative environmental impact of this tradition and solutions.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 20

Comments:
Quality of Writing

Grammar, character writing, and Punctuation
Excellent

My peer's storyboard contains a high standard of written language and understanding is seamless.

Quality of writing includes:
- Accurate punctuation (inc. commas where necessary, and end punctuation)
- A range of mostly accurate grammar structures
- Relevant and accurate vocabulary
Good

My peer's storyboard contains a good standard of written language, with some errors, but does not affect understanding.

Quality of writing includes:
- Accurate punctuation (inc. commas where necessary, and end punctuation)
- A range of mostly accurate grammar structures
- Relevant and accurate vocabulary
Fair

My peer's storyboard contains a fair standard of written language, with some errors that may cause difficulty in understanding.

Quality of writing includes:
- Accurate punctuation (inc. commas where necessary, and end punctuation)
- A range of mostly accurate grammar structures
- Relevant and accurate vocabulary
Needs Improvement

My peer's storyboard contains a written language with frequent and distracting errors, making it difficult in understanding.

Quality of writing includes:
- Accurate punctuation (inc. commas where necessary, and end punctuation)
- A range of mostly accurate grammar structures
- Relevant and accurate vocabulary
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 20

Comments:
Presentation Delivery
Fluency and Pronunciation

Pronunciation/Dialogue
Excellent

- My peer speaks clearly and uses his/her voice to emphasize important information.
- He/she does not relies or read from the notes.
- His/her sounds and tones of pronunciation are mostly correct.
Good

- My peer speaks clearly most of the time and sometimes uses his/her voice to emphasize important information.
- He/she occasionally relies or reads from the notes (fewer than 4 times)
- His/her sounds and tones of pronunciation are usually accurate.
Fair

- My peer speaks clearly some of the time but rarely uses his/her voice to emphasize important information.
- He/she frequently relies or reads from the notes (more than 5 times)
- His/her sounds and tones of pronunciation are frequently inaccurate and often difficult to understand.
Needs Improvement

- My peer dose not speak clearly and rarely use his/her voice to emphasize important information.
- He/she relies or read from the notes almost all the time.
- His/her sounds and tones of pronunciation is mostly inaccurate and my speech is almost always difficult to understand.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 20

Comments:
Visual Elements

Excellent

- All images are relevant and effective in showcasing his/her ideas.
- Slides and visual elements are visually appealing.
- Slides are formatted well and very easy to read and understand.
Good

- Most images are relevant and effective in showcasing his/her ideas.
- Slides and visual elements are mostly visually appealing.
- Slides are mostly formatted well but give little difficulty in reading and understanding.
Fair

- Some images are relevant and effective in showcasing his/her ideas.
- Some slides and visual elements are visually appealing, but may be too small.
- Slides are sometimes not formatted well and give some difficulty in reading and understanding.
Needs Improvement

- Images are often not relevant and do not support his/her ideas.
- Some slides and visual elements may be unsuitable or too small.
- Slides are mostly not formatted well and are difficult to read and understand.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 10

Comments:
Groupwork
Cooperation

Excellent

- He/she always worked well with other students.
- He/she frequently helped the group stay focused on the assignment.
- He/she showed leadership skills and encouraged all group members to contribute to the project.
Good

- He/she mostly worked well with other students.
- He/she stayed focused and contributed to all parts of the project.
- He/she sometimes became too focused on working individually.
Fair

- He/she some times worked well with other students.
- He/she sometimes went off-task and not engaged in all parts of the project.
- He/she often became too focused on working individually.
Needs Improvement

- He/she contributed little to the group.
- He/she needed to be reminded to stay on task or to participate.
- He/she seldom participation in the presentation.
Your Score

Points given: ________ /10

Comments:
Time Management

Excellent

- He/she used class time effectively to focus on the project, and no class time was wasted.
- He/she completed all parts of the project within the time limit.
Good

- He/she used most class time effectively on the project, , only a little class time was wasted.
- He/she completed all parts of the project within the time limit.
Fair

- He/she used most class time effectively on the project, but some time was wasted due to distractions.
- He/she completed most parts of the project within the time limit.
Needs Improvement

- He/she used minimal class time effectively on the project, and a lot of time was wasted through distractions.
- His/her project was not completed within the time limit.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 10

Comments:
Reflection

Excellent

He/she completed a peer- review to a high standard, including all required parts:

Requirements:
- At least 5 sentences.
- At least 2 references from other group’s storyboards on what they did well.
- How they can improve their own storyboard.
Good

He/she completed a peer- review including all required parts:

Requirements:
- At least 5 sentences.
- At least 2 references from other group’s storyboards on what they did well.
- How they can improve their own storyboard.
Fair

He/she completed a peer-review, but may have missed some parts:

Requirements:
-At least 5 sentences.
-At least 2 references from other group’s storyboards on what they did well.
- How they can improve their own storyboard.
Needs Improvement

He/she did not complete a peer-review, or did not include many parts:

Requirements:
-At least 5 sentences.
-At least 2 references from other group’s storyboards on what they did well.
- How they can improve their own storyboard.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 10

Comments:






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60