Skip to main content

iRubric: Poetry Analysis Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Poetry Analysis Rubric Power and the Individual Paper/Presentation Rubric This rubric is or be used for the English III Final spring semester. Rubric Code: J234W98 By Teachernew Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Presentation Remember, this is your FINAL EXAM. In total, this project is worth 20% of your grade for this semester.
	Poor (F) 0 pts	Limited (D) 1 pts	Fair (C) 2 pts	Good (B) 3 pts	Excellent (A) 4 pts
Context, Pt. 1	Poor Does not Introduce the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed. Gives no, or entirely irrelevant, background on the speaker.	Limited Introduces the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed insufficiently. Gives irrelevant or insufficient background on the speaker.	Fair Introduces the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed vaguely. Gives some relevant background on the speaker.	Good Introduces the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed. Gives mostly relevant and sufficient background on the speaker.	Excellent Introduces the work (speech, article, song, film, etc.) to be discussed and gives background on the speaker, with all relevant information and with nothing irrelevant.
Context, Pt. 2	Poor Gives no relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work: not having considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.	Limited Gives little relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having only vaguely considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.	Fair Gives some relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having somewhat considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.	Good Gives most of the relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having mostly considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.	Excellent Gives all relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having considered current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.
Comprehension & Analysis	Poor The connotative and/or denotative meanings are misunderstood and/or miscommunicated to the audience.	Limited The connotative and denotative meanings are shallowly understood and communicated to the audience, but with major lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.	Fair The connotative and denotative meanings are partially understood and communicated to the audience, with some lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.	Good The connotative and denotative meanings are understood and communicated to the audience, with some minor lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.	Excellent Both the connotative and denotative meanings are understood and successfully communicated to the audience.
Relationship to Theme	Poor Provided a vague interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Made no attempt to tie the work to issues of the twenty-first century.	Limited Provided a vague interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Made little attempt to tie the work to issues of the twenty-first century.	Fair Provided a somewhat convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Partially succeeded in tying the work to issues of the twenty-first century.	Good Provided a mostly clear and convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Successfully tied the work to issues of the twenty-first century.	Excellent Provided a clear and convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of Power & the Individual. Successfully tied the work to issues of the twenty-first century.
Presentation Standards	Poor Speaker is not well-practiced and has a shallow depth of knowledge, may be at times inaudible, may have little eye contact, and is overly reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides are overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.	Limited Speaker is somewhat practiced and has a shallow depth of knowledge, is mostly audible, makes some eye contact, reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides may be overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.	Fair Speaker is somewhat practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, often makes eye contact, but may be reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides may be overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.	Good Speaker is well practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, often makes eye contact, and is not overly reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides support the presenter, instead of the presenter supporting the slides. The slides show effort to do well, not to do the bare minimum.	Excellent Speaker is clearly practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, consistently makes eye contact, and is not reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides support the presenter, instead of the presenter supporting the slides. The slides show effort to do well, not to do the bare minimum.
Overall Quality/Effort	Poor The assignment was not taken seriously at all and was not important to the student. And/or the content and communication were not engaging. And/or student did not respect others.	Limited The assignment was not taken seriously and was not important to the student. Or the content and communication were not interesting/engaging. Or student did not respect others.	Fair The assignment was taken somewhat seriously and was somewhat important to the student. The content and communication were somewhat interesting/engaging. Student respected others.	Good The assignment was mostly taken seriously and was mostly important to the student. The content and telling of the research were mostly interesting/engaging. Student respected others.	Excellent Clearly shows that the assignment was taken seriously and was important to the student. The content of the research and the telling were quite interesting/ engaging. Student showed great respect for others.

Subjects:

English

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n67