iRubric: Engineering Design Process rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Engineering Design Process Engineering Design Process This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process. Rubric Code: HXX8CA4 By ccsteacher001 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5

Engineering Design Process
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Imagine	Poor Little or No evidence of imagine.	Fair Some evidence of imagine was observed.	Good Good evidence of the group thinking and brainstorming about what they were going to build.	Excellent They really got together as a group and imagined/brainstormed what they were going to build.
Plan	Poor Little or no evidence was planned out. They did not plan what they were going to build nor plan on what materials to use in the building.	Fair Some evidence of a plan. There was some thought to materials/building, but not really thought out.	Good Good evidence of planning done. Materials were listed and thought out, but the plan wasn't quite complete.	Excellent I can really see what you are going to be building. All materials were listed and well thought out. I can't wait to see how you build your parking garage.
Design	Poor Your design lacked materials that were needed. It was really hard for me to tell what you built or were building.	Fair Some materials were used correctly.	Good Good use of the materials and plan. The parking garage was nice and well put together, but there were parts that weren't well made.	Excellent Great use of materials! You maximized your use of materials and created a great parking garage.
Criteria	Poor Parking garage met less than 2 of the criteria.	Fair Parking garage only met 2 out of the 4 criteria.	Good Parking garage only met 3 out of the 4 criteria.	Excellent Parking garage met all 4 criteria.
Improvements	Poor Little to no improvements were made. Parking garage was either unsuccessful or not completed.	Fair Some improvement was made, but still did not have a successful parking garage.	Good A lot of improvement was made, but still did not have a successful parking garage.	Excellent A lot of improvement was made which lead to a successful parking garage.
Participation	Poor All or some group members had to be reminded several times to stay on task.	Fair Most group members participated during the building process. The group had to be redirected a few times.	Good The majority of the group members worked together and didn't have to be redirected that much at all.	Excellent All group members worked together flawlessly and got the job done. The group never had to be redirected.