iRubric: Multicultural project- judges rubric

Appropriate usage of grammar and vocabulary very few grammatical mistakes were made. Easily comprehensible.

Appropriately uses correct vocabulary and grammar most of the time. There are mistakes made, but comprehension is not affected.

Grammatical mistakes are regularly made. Vocabulary is lacking. Comprehension negatively affected.

Accuracy and Grammar use are lacking. Many mistakes are made. Comprehension is negatively affected and presentation is almost incomprehensible.

Students interpretation of content is fully present. There is not a didactic support to read off the presentation. Student feel confiedent with the content and there is eye contact and interaction with judges all the time.

There is eye contact with judges. Students use didactic support during the presentation but don´t rely on it.
Interpretation of the material is present.

There is some eye contact but there is a lack of interpretation. Students read most of the presentation.

Does not provide eye contact, and student reads the entire presentation out with little or non interpretation.

Project´s neatness is evident. Stand and all its elements are clean and organized. Correct use of space and originality of students´dress code is indisputable.

Students stand´s neatness is present but there are some elements that could better placed. Students dress code doesn´t connect much with the purpose of the project.

There are elements that are absent in the stand or are falling down.
Stand looks unorganized and there a little connection of the project purpose to the student´s dress code.

Stands looks completely unorganize, elements are missing and students
didn´t follow a dress code.

Students have an obvious representation/ knowledge of the geograophy of the country. In addition, project reflects knowledge and physical presence of gastronomy representation, traditions and culture, government type is defined and religion is respectfully showed. Elements describe diversity and main cities for turism.

There is some evidence that students know about the diversity, gastronomy, culture and other aspects that show knowledge about country. Some elements are represented and they used main cities as examples.

There is a lack of knowledge about culture and traditions. Students represent some important factors about diversity but there is not much evidence of them.

There is not physical evidence of knowledge about diversity, culture and traditions.