Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Statistics Survey Project Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Statistics Survey Project Rubric
Statistics Survey Project Rubric
Statistics Survey Project
Rubric Code:
HX82832
By
androparche
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Math
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Survey Project
Not Acceptable
1 pts
Poor
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Topic /Question
Not Acceptable
Neither topic/question nor background is not stated.
Poor
Both the topic/questions and the background provided are flawed in at least one area.
OR
Either topic/question or background is missing.
Fair
The topic/question is flawed in either one of the areas: clearly stated or appropriateness for an abservational study.
OR
The background provided fails to provide support to this topic/question or is irrelevent to student's lives.
Good
The topic/question selected is clearly stated and is appropriate for an observational study. The background provided gives adequate motivation for the group's choice of this topic/question and is somewhat relevent to student's lives.
Excellent
The topice/question selected is clearly stated and is appropriate for an observational study. The background provided gives strong motivation for the group's choice of this topic/questions and its relevence to student's lives.
Methodology-Sampling Procedure
Not Acceptable
The sampling procedure is weak in all areas and there is noticeable bias in the sample.
OR
Sampling procedure is is missing from report.
Poor
The sampling procedure is weak in all areas.
OR
There is noticeable bias in the sample.
Fair
The sampling procedure is weak in two of the following areas: appropriateness, description, or implementation.
OR
There is evidence of some bias in the sample.
Good
The sampling procedure is weak in one of the following areas: appropriateness, description, or implementation. No evidence of bias is present
Excellent
The sampling procedure is appropriate for the selected topic/question, is described accurately and completely, and is implemented according to the stated plan. No evidence of bias is present.
Methodolgy-Randomization
Not Acceptable
The randomization is flawed in all three area - labeling, number selection , and results
OR
Method is missing from report.
Poor
There is some flaw in the randomization procedure itself. Some aspect of the randomization-labeling, number selction, or results is completely correct.
Fair
The randomization process includes all three components listed at the right but the randomization process does not match the chosen sampling procedure.
OR
The randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure, but the clarity of communication would prevent easy replication of this randomization, in spite of it being correctly designed and implemented.
Good
The randomization process includes all three components listed at the right. However, clarity of communication would prevent easy replication of thei randomization. The randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure.
Excellent
The randomization process includes a clear and correct labeling of subjects, a description of the number selection process (random number table or calculator), and the results of the randomization (i.e. the numbers and subjects chosen). In addition the randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure.
The Survey and Questions
Not Acceptable
Survey questions are unclear and show distinct bias. Questions are missing from report and have never been submitted.
Poor
Survey questions not pre-tested, but are somewhat clear and relatively unbaised.
OR
Question are not included in the report and had not been previously OKed.
Fair
Survey questions have been pre-tested, but not completely refined or show some bias.
OR
Questions are not included in the report but have been previously submitted and OKed.
Good
Survey questions have all been pre-tested and refined. They are unbiased, but somewhat unclear.
Excellent
Survey questions have all been pre-tested and refined. They are clear and unbiased.
Survey questions are included in the appredix of the report.
Data Recording and Summarization
Not Acceptable
Original data is not available for review and the data is not tabulated appropriately.
Poor
Original data are unavailable for review but the data is summarized partially correct in a table.
OR
Original data are available for review but the table is not accurate.
Fair
Original data are unavailable for review but the data is summarized neatly, accurately and are clearly labeled.
OR
Original data are available for review, but there is a major flaw in the presentation of the data (but not in the accuracy of the tally).
Good
Original data are availabe for review and summarized in appropriate table form. The tables however minor errors, sloppy, or not clearly labeled.
Excellent
Original data are available for review and are summarized in an appropriate table form. Tables are neat, clearly labeled and accurate.
Graphical and Numberical Summaries
Not Acceptable
Neither the graphical nor the numberical summaries are appropriate.
Poor
Data has been correctly summarized graphically or numberically but not both.
Or
One of the data summaries is inappropriate.
Fair
Data has been correctly summarized either graphically or numberically but there is a major error in one of the components.
Good
Data has been correctly summarized using bar graphs/pie charts and counts/proportions/ percentages, but has made a minor error in either computation or graphing.
Excellent
Data has been correctly summarized using bar graphs/pie charts and counts/proportions/
percentages. Graphs are accurate, labeled appropriately and neat
Interpretation of Data
Not Acceptable
Interpretations and generalizations are missing.
Poor
Interpretations are attempted but are inadequate. Generalizations concerning the population of interest are omitted.
Fair
Interpretations of the graphical and numberical summaries have serious errors/omissions. In addition, an attempt is made at addressing generalization concerning the population of interest.
Good
Interpretations of the graphical and numberical summaries have minor errors or omissions. In addition some generalizations concerning the population of interst are identify.
Excellent
Interpretations of the graphical and numerical summaries are thorough and accurate. In addition, generalizations concerning the population of interest are identified.
Pitfalls and Extenstions
Not Acceptable
Encountered pitfalls is not discusses nor are any plausible extensions given.
Poor
Encountered pitfalls are articulated but no explanation concerning how these were dealt with is given
AND
No plausible extension of the project is given.
Fair
Some encountered pitfallas are articulated with a brief explanation of how these were dealt with
OR
No plausible extension of the project is given.
Good
Encountered pitfalls are clearly articulated, but explanations concerning how these were dealt with are unclear.
AND
One plausible extension of the project is given.
Excellent
Encountered pitfalls are clearly articulated along with explanations of how these pitfalls where dealt with.
AND
One plausible extension of the project is given.
Confidence Statment
Not Acceptable
The confidence statements fails in all of the following areas: applies to the population, correct confidence level, correct calculation of the margin of error, or understandability.
Poor
The confidence statements fails in threee of the following areas: applies to the population, correct confidence level, correct calculation of the margin of error, or understandability.
Fair
The confidence statements fails in two of the following areas: applies to the population, correct confidence level, correct calculation of the margin of error, or understandability.
Good
The confidence statements fails in one of the following areas: applies to the population, correct confidence level, correct calculation of the margin of error, or understandability.
Excellent
The confidence statement applies to the population, gives the correct confidence level, has a correctly calculated margin of error and is understandable.
English Mechanic
Not Acceptable
Writing is deficient in all four areas: grammar, punctuation,spelling, flow.
Poor
Writing is flawed in two or three areas: grammar, punctuation, spelling, flow.
Fair
Significant errors in one of the areas: grammar, punctutation, spelling or flow.
OR
Minor erros in two areas.
Good
Writing is grammatically correct, is punctuated properly, and flow locially from one point to the next, except for minor errors in one of these categories. No speling mistakes!!
Excellent
Writing is grammatically correct, is punctuated propertly, and flow logically from one pont to the next. No spelling mistakes!!
Peer Evaluation
Not Acceptable
Received an F average from group members.
Poor
Received an D average from group members.
Fair
Received an C average from group members.
Good
Received an B average from group members.
Excellent
Received an A average from group members.
Keywords:
Statistics
Subjects:
Math
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Math rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.