Skip to main content

iRubric: Presentation archaeological site rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Presentation archaeological site 
Empires/Powers Group Project
Team presentation of an ancient archaeological site and its biblical relevance. The research and presentation must be thorough, using scholarly sources. The presentation may take on a variety of forms but may not be read from a paper or from screens. Each presentation must have a prepared student resource and last 20 minutes.
Rubric Code: HX33WB2
By RenateHood
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Presentation archaeologocal site
  Exceeds

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Unacceptable

1 pts

Quality of project
35 %

Exceeds

Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow.
Project was researched fully and connected the archaeological site to the Bible; it showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Good

Project was organized. Information presented was clear and interesting. Project was researched and connected the archaeological site to the Bible; it showed critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Fair

Project was fairly organized. Information presented somewhat clear. Project was not researched fully and did not connect the archaeological site to the Bible; it showed some critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Poor

Project was poorly organized. Information presented was clear at times. Project was researched poorly and connected the archaeological site to the Bible in a poor manner; it showed poor thinking and little application of knowledge gathered.
Unacceptable

Project was not organized. Information presented was not clear. Project was not researched nor was the archaeological site connected to the Bible; it showed no critical thinking or application of knowledge gathered.
Classroom Presentation
25 %

Exceeds

Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the professor.
Good

Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.
Fair

Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were mostly
unable to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.
Poor

Presentation was somehwat audible, but needs lots of improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project need improvement. Group members were not able to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.
Unacceptable

Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the professor.
Preparedness
20 %

Exceeds

Students showed that they were completely prepared and that they had rehearsed before the presentation. They demonstrated knowledge of the subject area.
Good

Students seemed to be prepared but one person seemed to carry the success of the presentation.
Fair

Students seemed to be failry prepared but should have rehearsed more as a team.
Poor

Students appeared prepared poorly.
Unacceptable

Students did not seem prepared to present.
Student handout
20 %

Exceeds

Group prepared a clear and informative student handout. The handout was submitted to the professor ahead of time.
Good

Group prepared a fairly clear and informative student handout. The handout was submitted to the professor ahead of time.
Fair

The group turned in a student handout to the professor ahead of time but the handout lacked in content and organization.
Poor

The group had a student handout but turned it in late.
Unacceptable

The group did not have a student handout.



Keywords:
  • Archaeologocal presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202