Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Team Identity Presentation Evaluation Form rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Team Identity Presentation Evaluation Form
Team Presentation Evaluation Form
Rubric Code:
HX264B8
By
dmallen
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Team Presentation Evaluation Form
Enter rubric description
Excellent
95 pts
Good
85 pts
Average
75 pts
Poor
0 pts
Organization
10 %
Excellent
Consistently clear, concise, well organized. Points were easy to follow because of the organization. Transitions between sections & speakers smooth and coordinated.
Good
Consistently clear,<BR>
concise, well organized. Points were easy to follow<BR>
because of the organization. Transitions between sections & speakers<BR>
smooth and oordinated.
Average
Not always clear or<BR>
concise. Organization was adequate, but weak. Occasionally wandered and was sometimes difficult to follow. Transitions between sections & speakers weak.
Poor
Often unclear and<BR>
disorganized, rambled too much. The presentation was<BR>
confusing and difficult to follow. Transitions between sections & speakers awkward.
Team Identity
40 %
Excellent
Displayed an excellent grasp of the of group formation process. <BR> Demonstrated excellent mastery of content that led to name, slogan, logo, and motto.
Good
Displayed a general<BR>
grasp of group formation process.<BR>
Demonstrated good mastery of content that led to name, slogan, logo, and motto.
Average
Displayed some grasp of group formation process.<BR>
Demonstrated adequate understanding of content that led to name, slogan, logo, and motto.
Poor
Displayed a poor grasp of the group formation process.<BR>
Demonstrated superficial knowledge of content that led to name, slogan, logo, and motto.
Visual Aids & Handouts
10 %
Excellent
Simple, clear, easy to<BR>
interpret, easy to read. Well coordinated with content, well designed, used very<BR>
effectively. Excellent<BR>
example of how to prepare and use good visual aids
Good
Usually clear, easy to<BR>
interpret, easy to read. Generally well coordinated with content, design was<BR>
okay, generally used<BR>
effectively. Demonstrated<BR>
some understanding of how to use visual aids.
Average
Marginally acceptable,<BR>
too complex, crowded, difficult to read or interpret.<BR>
Adequate coordination with<BR>
content. Used only<BR>
adequately. Showed little<BR>
understanding of how to<BR>
prepare and use visual aids.
Poor
Poor quality visual aids (or none), hard to read, technically inaccurate, poorly<BR>
constructed. Poor<BR>
coordination with content. Used poorly. The presenter did not seem to know how to<BR>
prepare or use visual aids effectively.
Creativity
20 %
Excellent
Very creative and<BR>
original. Imaginative design and use of materials. Novel<BR>
handouts, visual aids, or methods.
Good
Exhibited some<BR>
originality and creativity.
Average
Routine treatment,<BR>
minimal thought given to originality or creativity.
Poor
Lacked creativity. Very ordinary and mundane.
Summary
10 %
Excellent
Clear, concise, major<BR>
points emphasized, clear recommendations, strong conclusion or call for action.
Good
Referred to main points, recommendations weak or missing, weak conclusion or<BR>
call for action.
Average
Vague mention of major points, no recommendations,<BR>
weak conclusion, weak or no call for action.
Poor
No summary, no<BR>
recommendations, no<BR>
conclusions, no call for action.<BR>
<BR>
"That's it."
"Choreography" of Team
10 %
Excellent
Excellent stage<BR>
presence. Confident, used notes well, at ease, excellent gestures, good audience attention, good eye contact. Smooth transitions between speakers in every case.
Good
Good stage presence.<BR>
Fairly confident, used notes fairly well, good gestures,<BR>
acceptable audience<BR>
attention and eye contact. Mostly smooth transitions between speakers.
Average
Adequate stage<BR>
presence. Read parts,<BR>
fumbled with notes, several distracting mannerisms, minimal gestures, minimal<BR>
eye contact, too many ums. Awkward transitions between speakers.
Poor
Poor stage presence.<BR>
Unprepared, awkward, shuffled papers, poor eye<BR>
contact, lots of ums, turned from audience to read screens, shuffled feet, fidgeted. Poor gestures & transitions between speakers.
Subjects:
Communication
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.