Skip to main content

iRubric: BPSGT Look-A-Like rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
BPSGT Look-A-Like BPSGT Look-A-Like Build a famous building out of everyday objects. You must choose your objects carefully and creatively so they have the look of the architectural feature which you are trying to replicate. Your Look-A-Like must also include appropriate landscaping and be accompanied by a picture of the building you are trying to recreate (citations are a must!) Please refer to examples contained in the various Look-A-Like books by Joy Steiner. Rubric Code: HC2A4C By wattersonk Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

BPSGT Look-A-Like
	EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS (N/A)	EXEMPLARY 4 pts	GOOD 3 pts	FAIR 2 pts	UNACCEPTABLE 1 pts	DID NOT COMPLETE 0 pts
DRAWING DUE WEEK OF March 3	EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS	EXEMPLARY Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes at least 6 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.	GOOD Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 4-5 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.	FAIR Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 2-3 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.	UNACCEPTABLE Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 1 architectural feature with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.	DID NOT COMPLETE Lack of neatness and accuracy make this drawing illegible. No architectural features are labeled. Missing a picture with citations for reference.
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES DUE WEEK OF March 3	EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS	EXEMPLARY Constructed a famous building with at least 6 architectural features.	GOOD Constructed a famous building with 4-5 architectural features.	FAIR Constructed a famous building with at 2-3 architectural features.	UNACCEPTABLE Constructed a famous building with 1 architectural feature.	DID NOT COMPLETE Did not choose an appropriate building.
MATERIALS DUE WEEK OF March 3	EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS	EXEMPLARY Appropriate materials were selected and used creatively to demonstrate architectural features.	GOOD Appropriate materials were selected and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate architectural features.	FAIR Few appropriate materials were selected and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate architectural features.	UNACCEPTABLE Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product which looked inaccurate.	DID NOT COMPLETE Inappropriate materials were selected. No evidence of creativity.
LANDSCAPING DUE WEEK OF March 3	EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS	EXEMPLARY Appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and used to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.	GOOD Appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.	FAIR Few appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.	UNACCEPTABLE Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product which looked inaccurate.	DID NOT COMPLETE Landscaping was not evident.
QUALITY DUE WEEK OF March 3	EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS	EXEMPLARY Great care was taken in the construction process so that the building is neat, attractive, and follows plan accurately.	GOOD Construction was careful and accurate for the most part, but 1-2 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.	FAIR Construction accurately followed the drawing, but 3-4 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.	UNACCEPTABLE Construction appears careless or haphazard. Many details need refinement for a strong or attractive product.	DID NOT COMPLETE Insufficient quality evidenced in incomplete or ineffective construction.
PRESENTATION DUE WEEK OF March 3	EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS	EXEMPLARY Well rehearsed and appropriate voice level. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.	GOOD Prepared, but could benefit from rehearsal or voice projection. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.	FAIR Poorly prepared and/or unable to identify architectural features.	UNACCEPTABLE It is apparent that student did not rehearse the presentation prior to class.	DID NOT COMPLETE Student chose not to present.

Keywords:

architecture

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202