iRubric: W200 ePortfolio - Fall 2013 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
W200 ePortfolio - Fall 2013 Rubric Code: HB5C39 By educw200student Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: ePortfolio Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Introductory Pages
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Home Page	Missing	Poor -Welcome message is poorly written, and not written for an adult audience -Purpose of ePortfolio pages are not described -Creative commons license not applied	Fair -Welcome message is decently written, and written to an adult audience -Purpose of each ePortfolio page is described -Visually appealing -Creative commons license applied	Good -Welcome message is well written, and written with teachers and administrators as the audience -Purpose and content of each ePortfolio page is described -Visually appealing -Creative commons license applied	Great -Welcome message is professional in content, and written with teachers and administrators as the audience -Purpose and content of each ePortfolio page is described -Visually appealing -Creative commons license applied	Excellent - Welcome message is professional in content and tone, and is written with teachers and administrators as the audience - Purpose and content of each ePortfolio page is well described -Description of pages includes links to those pages - Visually appealing, -Creative commons license is applied
About Me Page	Missing	Poor - Unprofessional picture of you - Required elements missing or poorly done	Fair - Picture of you - Introduction includes: (1) Description of you (name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach) (2) A statement concerning why you want to be a teacher (3) Brief description of your pedagogical beliefs (4) Brief description of your beliefs about technology in the classroom (5) Embedded digital story with title and description	Good - Good picture of you - Introduction includes: (1) Description of you (name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach) (2) A statement concerning why you want to be a teacher (3) Complete description of your pedagogical beliefs (4) Complete description of your beliefs about technology in the classroom (5) Embedded digital story with title, reflection, and description	Great - Professional picture of you - Introduction includes: (1) Description of you (name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach) (2) A well written statement concerning why you want to be a teacher (3) Well written description of your pedagogical beliefs (4) Well written description of your beliefs about technology in the classroom (5) Embedded digital story with title, reflection, and description	Excellent - Professional picture of you or equivalent [Points deducted for cropped images or inappropriate images ] - Introduction includes: (1) Description of you (name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach) (2) Compelling statement concerning why you want to be a teacher (3) Description of your defining pedagogical beliefs (4) Detailed description of your beliefs about technology in the classroom (5) Embedded digital story with title, reflection, and descri
Gallery Page
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 3 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 9 pts	Great 12 pts	Excellent 15 pts
Enter Title	Missing	Poor -Fewer than five examples of your best work -Not all examples are public and published -Not all examples have a linked title, screenshot/embed, -Some descriptions are missing	Fair -Five examples of your best work -All examples are public and published -All examples are have a linked title, screenshot/embed. -For each example there is a description of its educational value	Good -Five examples of your best work -All examples are public and published -All examples are have a linked title, screenshot/embed -For each example, a description, and a description of its educational value	Great -Five examples of your best work; work is of high quality -All examples are public and published -All examples are have a linked title, screenshot/embed -For each example, a description, and a description of its educational value	Excellent -Five or more examples of your best work; work is of high quality -All examples are public and published -All examples are have a linked title, screenshot/embed -For each example, a detailed description, and a well articulated defense of its educational value
Case Project/Service Learning
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Acceptable 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Enter Title	Missing	Poor -One or more required elements are missing or incomplete	Fair -Case analysis project is public and correctly embedded on the page -Artifacts are embedded, and have titles and descriptions -Hyperlinks are active and documents are public -Pages are not well organized	Acceptable -Case analysis project is public and correctly embedded on the page -Artifacts are embedded, titled, and described -Hyperlinks are active, documents are public -Each page is somewhat organized	Good -Case analysis project is public and correctly embedded on the page -Artifacts are embedded, and have descriptions and titles -Hyperlinks are active and documents are public -Each page is decently organized	Excellent -Case analysis project is public and correctly embedded on the page -Artifacts are embedded, and have well-written descriptions and titles -Hyperlinks are active and documents are public -Each page is well organized
NETS-T Standards
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 1.5 pts	Good 2 pts	Great 2.5 pts	Excellent 3 pts
NETS-T 1	Missing	Poor - 1 example of evidence for each standard - Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit	Fair - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Minimal connections made between standard and example	Good - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard	Great - 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard -Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard	Excellent -3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5 -Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
NETS-T 2	Missing	Poor - 1 example of evidence for each standard - Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit	Fair - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Minimal connections made between standard and example	Good - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard	Great - 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard -Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard	Excellent -3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5 -Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
NETS-T 3	Missing	Poor - 1 example of evidence for each standard - Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit	Fair - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Minimal connections made between standard and example	Good - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard	Great - 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard -Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard	Excellent -3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5 -Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
NETS-T 4	Missing	Poor - 1 example of evidence for each standard - Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit	Fair - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Minimal connections made between standard and example	Good - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard	Great - 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard -Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard	Excellent -3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5 -Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
NETS-T 5	Missing	Poor - 1 example of evidence for each standard - Connection between standard and evidence is not made explicit	Fair - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Minimal connections made between standard and example	Good - 2 examples of evidence for each standard - Described each example in at least two to three sentences and connected the examples to the standard	Great - 3 examples of evidence for each NETS-T standard -Each example described in at least three sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard	Excellent -3 or more examples of evidence for each of the NETS-T standards #1-5 -Each example described in three or more sentences that explicitly state the connection between your example and the standard
Professional Development
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Profiler Pro data and Analysis	Missing -Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are missing	Poor -Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present -Strengths and weaknesses are minimally addressed -Strengths and weaknesses are not based on the survey data -No references to survey items	Fair -Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present -2 areas of strength and 2 areas of weaknesses are presented -Strengths and weaknesses are based on the survey data -References to survey items are minimal	Good -Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present -At least 3 strengths and 3 areas of improvements are presented -Strengths and areas of weaknesses are based on the survey data -Specific reference to the survey categories/items are included	Great -Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present -At least 3 strengths and 3 areas of improvements are presented -Strengths and areas of weaknesses are based on the survey data -Specific reference to the survey categories/items are included	Excellent -Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images are present -3 or more strengths and 3 or more areas of improvements are well described -Strengths and areas of weaknesses are based on the survey data -Specific reference to the survey categories/items are included
Profile goals and evidence	Missing	Poor - One PD goals, does not meet the SMART criteria - Personal statement on whether goals have been met is missing or incomplete - Evidences are not described	Fair -Two PD goals that somewhat meet the SMART criteria, lacking one or more of the characteristics of SMART goal - Personal statement on whether goals have been met is not well written - Evidences are not described	Good - Three PD goals mostly met the SMART criteria -Personal statement on whether goals have been met is presented -Evidences are described	Great -Three PD goals have met the SMART criteria -Personal statement on whether the goals have been met is detailed and specific -Evidences are well described	Excellent -Three PD goals explicitly meet the SMART criteria -Personal statement on whether goals have been met is detailed, specific, and contains a future plan of action -Evidences are described in detail
TIP #11: PLN	Missing	Poor -Screenshot missing -PLN Hyperlink reveals content not relevant to education	Fair -Screenshot and hyperlink to your PLN -PLN Hyperlink reveals some education-related content	Good -Screenshot and hyperlink to your PLN -PLN hyperlink reveals a PLN with an aggregated data or social connection to education topics	Great -Screenshot and hyperlink to your PLN -PLN hyperlink reveals a PLN with an aggregated data or social connection to topics relevant to your teaching interests	Excellent -Screenshot and hyperlink to your PLN -PLN hyperlink reveals a well developed PLN with an aggregated data or social connection to topics relevant to your teaching interests
TIP#12: LMS	Missing	Poor -Missing screenshot, title, or minimal descriptions or comparisons of LMS - Minimally completed descriptions or comparisons	Fair -Title of the LMS you chose -Screenshot of your course -Description of the LMS option -Minimal comparison of different features of the LMS with the one you use as an IU student	Good -Title of the LMS you chose -Screenshot of your course -Description of the LMS option -Some comparison of different features of the LMS you chose to the one you use as an IU student	Great -Title of the LMS you chose -Screenshot of your course -Description of the LMS option and how it can be used when teaching online -Adequate comparison of different features of the LMS you chose to the one you use as an IU student	Excellent -Title of the LMS you chose -Screenshot of your course -Well written description of the LMS option and how it can be used when teaching online -Detailed comparison of different features of the LMS you chose to the one you use as an IU student
Formatting and Font
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Formatting, copyright	Missing	Poor Overall format is poor, lacking any consideration for formatting and detail -Spacing between blocks of text are irregular -Numbered lists do not contain indents -Font face, size, and color are not consistent nor readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links	Fair Overall format is fair, but inconsistent with many missed details -Spacing between blocks of text are sometimes irregular -Numbered lists do not contain indents -Font face, size, and color are not consistent nor readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links	Good Overall format is acceptable but inconsistent: -Spacing between blocks of text are mostly consistent -Numbered lists are indented -Font face, size, and color are fairly consistent and readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links -Navigation box contains creative commons logo	Great Page formatting is high quality -Spacing between blocks of text are consistent -Numbered lists are indented -Font face, size, and color are consistent and readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links -Navigation box contains creative commons logo	Excellent Page formatting on all pages is flawless, consistent, and exceptionally completed -Spacing between blocks of text are consistent -Numbered lists are indented -Font face, size, and color are consistent and readable for the following: Titles, subheadings, body and text links Navigation box contains creative commons logo
Writing
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Writing mechanics	Missing	Poor - Proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization is not present - Proper pronouns are not used - Writing is unprofessional or informal	Fair - A range of spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors have been spotted - Proper pronouns are seldom used - Writing is sometimes informal/not professional	Good - Some spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors have been spotted - Proper pronouns are not always used - Writing is sometimes informal/not professional	Great - Very few spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization errors - Proper nouns are used appropriately - Writing is formal/professional	Excellent - No spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors are found - Appropriate use of proper nouns (e.g., Internet, Google, SMART Board, PowerPoint, etc...) - Writing is strongly formal/professional (avoids contractions, abbreviations, “I feel/think”)
Overall quality
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 6 pts	Great 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Overal quality	Missing	Poor The ePortfolio is not acceptable as professional, evidence for potential as a teacher is weak or incomplete.	Fair The ePortfolio is less than professional, and evidence of potential is not strong	Good The ePortfolio is somewhat professional and showing some evidence of one's potential as a teacher	Great The ePortfolio is acceptably professional, and shows good evidence of one's potential as a teacher	Excellent The ePortfolio is exceptionally professional and showing strong evidence of one's potential as a teacher
eBook Page
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 6 pts	Great 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
eBook links and description	Missing eBook is missing, description is missing.	Poor eBook is embedded or linked. Description is minimal.	Fair eBook is embedded or linked. Description includes a summary of contents	Good eBook is embedded or linked. Description includes a summary of the eBook's goals and contents	Great eBook is embedded or linked. Page includes a description of the eBook's learning goals and a summary of contents, highlighting key features	Excellent eBook is embedded or linked. Page includes a description of the eBooks' learning goals, and a description of how its design helps learners meet those goals, highlighting key features of the book

Keywords:

W200 Spring 2013 ePortfolio

Subjects:

Education

Types:

ePortfolio

Discuss this rubric