Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Literature Review rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Literature Review
Rubric Code:
HACX5
By
RBagley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Literature Review
Excellent
2 pts
Above Average
1.5 pts
Good
1 pts
Poor
0.5 pts
Unsatisfactory
0 pts
Focus (X 2)
200 %
Excellent
All paragraphs are consistently understandable and related to the main topic.
Above Average
Most paragraphs are understandable and related to the main topic.
Good
Some paragraphs are confusing and lack relationship to the main topic.
Poor
Very confusing and minimal relationship to the main topic.
Unsatisfactory
Very unclear and seemingly misses the point entirely.
Organization (X 2)
200 %
Excellent
All information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs that include transitions, topic sentences, and concluding sentences. Introduction clearly identifies the research focus. Conclusion provides a clear and complete summary of findings.
Above Average
Most information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs that include transitions, topic sentences, and concluding sentences. Introduction identifies the research focus. Conclusion provides a clear summary of findings.
Good
Some information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs that include transitions, topic sentences, and concluding sentences. Introduction identifies the research focus. Conclusion provides a summary of findings.
Poor
Little information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs that include transitions, topic sentences, and concluding sentences. Introduction identifies the research focus. Conclusion provides a summary of findings.
Unsatisfactory
Information lacks organization. Introduction fails to identify the research focus. Conclusion does not provide a summary of findings.
Purpose
100 %
Excellent
Summarizes and synthesizes the content of the sources.
Above Average
Mainly summarizes and synthesizes the content of the sources but includes some of the author's ideas, interpretations, and conclusions.
Good
Blends source material with the author's ideas, interpretations, and conclusions.
Poor
Makes use of sources to support the author's ideas, interpretations, and conclusions.
Unsatisfactory
Primarily presents the author's ideas, interpretations, and conclusions.
Sources
100 %
Excellent
At least 5 sources representing at least three different types (e.g. book, periodical, web, media)
Above Average
At least 4 sources representing at least three different types (e.g. book, periodical, web, media)
Good
At least 4 sources representing at least two different types (e.g. book, periodical, web, media)
Poor
At least 3 sources representing at least two different types (e.g. book, periodical, web, media)
Unsatisfactory
Less than 3 sources or representing only one type of source material.
Citations
100 %
Excellent
All references to source materials are clearly and properly cited using APA style.
Above Average
Most references to source materials are clearly and properly cited using APA style.
Good
Some references to source materials are clearly and properly cited using APA style.
Poor
Few references to source materials are clearly and properly cited using APA style.
Unsatisfactory
No references to source materials are clearly and properly cited using APA style.
Mechanics
100 %
Excellent
No more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
Above Average
No more than five grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
Good
No more than seven grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
Poor
No more than nine grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
Unsatisfactory
More than nine grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
Reference List
100 %
Excellent
Reference list contains all sources referred to in the paper, and no extra sources. APA style is error-free.
Above Average
Reference list contains all sources referred to in the paper, and no extra sources. APA style is almost error-free.
Good
Reference list contains most sources referred to in the paper, and no extra sources. APA style is almost error-free.
Poor
Reference list contains most sources referred to in the paper. No major errors in APA style.
Unsatisfactory
Reference list omits sources referred to in the paper, and/or includes extra sources. Major errors in APA style.
APA Format
100 %
Excellent
No APA style or formatting errors.
Above Average
Almost no APA style or formatting errors.
Good
A few minor APA style or formatting errors.
Poor
A few major APA style or formatting errors.
Unsatisfactory
Many APA style or formatting errors.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.