iRubric: ET ADV Speaking Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ET ADV Speaking Rubric ET Speaking Rubric Advanced (2012) Rubric to assess student's performance on their oral presentation. ET/YA 41,42,51,52 Rubric Code: HACA75 By eliassessment Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Conversation about units' topics
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 1.5 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 2.5 pts
Vocabulary	Poor Student couldn't use most vocabulary words and expressions from the ones seen in class. He/she couldn't elaborate on his ideas because he lacked the vocabulary.	Fair Student used basic vocabulary and expressions from the ones seen in class in his/her answers.	Good Student used a good number of vocabulary words and expressions from the ones worked on in class.	Excellent Student showed an ability to use vocabulary words and expressions to express his/her ideas.
Accuracy	Poor Poor use of grammar. Meaning is often unclear. Many errors.	Fair Adequate use of grammar. Meaning is sometimes unclear. Some errors are still present.	Good Good use of grammar. Meaning is mostly clearly conveyed. A few errors are still present.	Excellent Excellent use of grammar. Meaning is very clear. Very few errors present. Ideas were expressed clearly.
Task Completion	Poor Student wasn't able to present his/her favorite online community. Missed many of the key elements, used next to no detail when presenting. Gave little if no advice to newcomers.	Fair Student was somewhat able to describe his/her favorite online community. Not all the important aspects were explained, there was very little detail in general. Advice to newcomers was unclear/incomplete.	Good Student was able to present his/her favorite online community, describing its key aspects in good detail. Some basic orientations were give as advice to newcomers.	Excellent Student was able to present his/her favorite online community, detailing its key aspects with great precision and explaining how to blend it quickly as a newcomer.
Speaking Mechanics	Poor Fluency was poor. The conversation was filled with long pauses. There was very little rhythm. This showed a lack of ability in using stress, intonation as well as other speech patterns. .	Fair Fluency was acceptable. There was little evidence of awareness or ability to manage intonation or stress patterns in English.	Good There was a good sense of fluency to this conversation. The student showed awareness and ability to manage intonation, pauses and stress patterns in English.	Excellent Fluency was native-live. Student showed an ability to follow the natural rhythm of the language. Making stresses, and pauses where expected.