- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: SAE Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
SAE Rubric SAE Rubric RUBRIC for all end of the year SAE projects. Rubric Code: HA2C26 By crandall Draft Public Rubric Subject: Vocational Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

SAE Rubric Enter rubric description
	Excellent 25 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 10 pts	Poor 0 pts
Information Cover Sheet	Excellent Completely filled in	Fair Only name & Address	Good Name and Address and more are completed	Poor Only Name
Description of project on cover page	Excellent Description of project is well thought out and shows depth of thought.<BR> <BR> Project is appropriate for student and will challenge the student.	Fair Description is less than 10 words or incomplete sentence.<BR> <BR> Project does not offer opportunity to learn new skill.	Good Description of project is simple and is at least 3 descriptive sentences.<BR> <BR> Project is appropriate but will not challenge	Poor No description or very limited
Skills expected to be learned	Excellent Student explains list of 8-12 skills he/she expects to learn or develop.	Fair Student list 4-8 skills expected to learn or develop.	Good Student list 1-4 skills expected to learn	Poor No list of skills
Job or Research activities
	Excellent 30 pts	Good 25 pts	Fair 16 pts	Poor 10 pts
Job or Research	Excellent Date, Description, and time recorded in hours<BR> and some comments or finding included<BR> <BR> 15 hours	Good Date and brief description, comments lacking<BR> <BR> 12 hours reported	Fair Date, Description, Incomplete, date, description or hours<BR> <BR> 8 hours reported	Poor Incomplete description, not reported in hours, comments lacking, <BR> <BR> hours not reported as numerical hours, the words "hours or minutes" are written<BR> <BR> 5 hours or less reported
Income & Expense
	Excellent 50 pts	Good 30 pts	Poor 20 pts	(N/A)
Income & Expenses	Excellent Income or expenses relate to dates on job page <BR> or<BR> the words "do not apply" are included	Good Expenses or Income are included but do not match the dates of the job	Poor Information not included or not accurate	N/A
Leadership & Pictures
	Excellent 25 pts	Good 15 pts	Poor 10 pts	(N/A)
Leadership FFA	Excellent Student FFA member participating in Activities	Good Student FFA Member	Poor Student Not and FFA Member	N/A
Leadership Other	Excellent Student Active in other school club, church, community, or athletic activity for 3 years	Good Student Active in other school club, church, community or athletic activity for 1-3 years	Poor Student Active in other school club, church, community or athletic activity	N/A
Pictures	Excellent Abundance of pictures showing progress of students. Pictures taken throughout the project, and on many different subject matter, and different days of taken. Over 10 pictures	Good Pictures showing numerous subject matter, student not present in some, Seem to be taken in succession 5-10 pictures	Poor Few working pictures taken. Pictures seem to be staged. less than 5	N/A
Written Summary
	Excellent 50 pts	Good 40 pts	Fair 30 pts	Poor 20 pts
Summary	Excellent Clearly written, with abundance of thought put into the work. Has given us a clear picture as to the entire process of the project. Spoke of numerous skills and the future project advancement is clearly in place. Went above and beyond what was required over 2 pages	Good Paper meets all criteria, but no further individualism is shown. Paper is well written, and gives us some incite, but does leaves us wanting more. 2 pages	Fair Paper has few grammatical errors. Information is there but not in depth. Minimal information given and paper leaves many questions 1 page	Poor Paper does not answer all the necessary questions, is not organized, and clearly was not thought out
Format	Excellent Typed Double Spaced 12 pt font 1" margins Spelling and grammar no errors	Good few spelling or grammar errors	Fair numerous spelling or grammar errors. So many they start effecting the reading of paper.	Poor Too many errors to have a legible paper.
Presentation Semester final
	Excellent 50 pts	Good 40 pts	Fair 30 pts	Poor 20 pts
Oral presentation	Excellent Presenter knows the information. Very apparent they did the job, understood their learnings, and have a future in mind. They can answer any question that is relevant with knowledge and wisdom. Very pleasant to listen to and the presenters excitement is apparent.	Good The presenter does an adequate job informing us about project, but lacking enthusiasm. They answer most questions with knowledge and wisdom of their project.	Fair Presenter tells us minimum information. They cannot answer some questions. Lack emotion and enthusiasm about their project.	Poor Not apparent the presenter even did the project.

Subjects:

Vocational

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric