Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Artist Research Parody rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Artist Research Parody
Students will create a Parody of a Master painting, substituting animals as the human subject matter and creatively altering elements to engage the viewer in subtle changes of the original composition. Students will use knowledge of Color Theory and skill in color mixing to imitate the style of the work used for inspiration. All colors will be mixed and applied in a consistent manner. An Aesthetic Criticism will be written to Describe, Interpret, and Judge their work.
Rubric Code:
H98W3W
By
dianneskye
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criteria: Studio Habits
Excellent
6 pts
Strong
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Moderate
3 pts
Weak
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Observe, Envision, Express
Excellent
The student chose a challenging Master work to parody. The parody and subtle changes in subject matter is totally the concept of the student. The artwork demonstrates original personal expression and outstanding problem solving skills.
Strong
The student chose a somewhat challenging Master work to parody. Some subject matter is subtly changed and is the concept of the student. The artwork demonstrates strong personal expression and strong problem solving skills.
Good
Student chose an interesting Master work to parody. Subject matter in composition is changed through suggestions of the instructor. The artwork demonstrates some personal expression and logical problem solving skills.
Moderate
Student chose a non-challenging Master work to parody. Student transformed the human to animal characteristics in the composition but did not alter any other elements for interest. Work shows moderate personal expression and moderate problem solving skills.
Weak
Student did not choose a Master work for the parody project. Teacher directed the choice. Student did not change any elements in the composition except for the exchange of animal for human characteristics. Weak personal expression and problem solving skills.
Poor
Student made very little attempt to create a parody inspired by a Master work.
Develop Craft, Stretch & Explore
Excellent
The artwork demonstrates outstanding use of medium to represent the technique and style of the researched artist. Excellent demonstration of understanding of Color Theory and all colors are mixed. Colors are layered with complements. Color application is consistent.
Strong
The artwork demonstrates strong use of medium to represent the technique and style of the researched artist. Work shows strong understanding of Color Theory and most colors are mixed. Complement layers are evident and application of color is mostly consistent.
Good
Medium is used well and mostly represents the style of the artist of research. Understanding of Color Theory is apparent but complementary layers are not consistently obvious. Color application is mostly consistent.
Moderate
Medium is used with moderate skill and only moderately represents the style of the artist of research. Some understanding of Color Theory and color mixing is evident. Color application is not consistent.
Weak
Weak use of the medium. Little color mixing has been done and little understanding of Color Theory is evident. Color application is very inconsistent with no obvious layering of the complements.
Poor
Student made very little attempt to develop the craft of the medium or stretching to explore the concepts.
Reflect, Engage & Persist
Excellent
Student consistently challenged self to reflect on work, persist through problems, revise and improve.The artwork shows outstanding craftsmanship, with clear attention to control, adaptation, and experimentation of medium.
Strong
Student nearly always challenged self to reflect on work, persist through problems, revise and improve. The artwork shows strong craftsmanship, with attention to control and adaptation of the medium.
Good
Student mostly challenge self to reflect, persist, revise and improve. The artwork shows good craftsmanship but could show more attention to control and adaptation of the medium.
Moderate
Student only periodically reflected and persisted through problems. Some revisions were made to improve the work. Craftsmanship lacks quality in regard to control and adaptation of the medium.
Weak
Student rarely reflected on problems encountered in this process. Few revisions were made and then only at the insistence of the instructor. Craftsmanship is weak.
Poor
Student made no attempt to reflect, persist, or revise.
Understand Art World
Excellent
Outstanding verbal, visual, or written knowledge of the researched artist and style demonstrated clearly in daily journal entries and Aesthetic Criticism.
Outstanding classroom behavior, use of time, work ethic, and degree of conceptual understanding clearly demonstrated.
Strong
Good verbal, visual, or written knowledge of the researched artist and style demonstrated in daily journal entries and Aesthetic Criticism.
Good classroom behavior, use of time, work ethic, and degree of conceptual understanding demonstrated.
Good
Average verbal, visual, or written knowledge of the researched artist and style demonstrated in daily journal entries and Aesthetic Criticism.
Average classroom behavior, use of time, work ethic, and degree of conceptual understanding demonstrated.
Moderate
Minimal verbal, visual, or written knowledge of the researched artist and style demonstrated in daily journal entries and Aesthetic Criticism.
Moderate classroom behavior, use of time, work ethic, and degree of conceptual understanding demonstrated.
Weak
The student put forth little or no effort, and/or the project was not completed; class time was not used well.
Little or no verbal, visual, or written knowledge of the researched artist and style demonstrated in Aesthetic Criticism.
Poor
Project not completed; Aesthetic Criticism not attempted; extremely poor use of class time.
Keywords:
Parody, Color Theory, Color Mixing, Style, Aesthetic Criticism
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.