- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Industry Interview rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Industry Interview Industry Interview This is for an intro level course. Students have to go out and interview managers in the field, answer the questions, and then provide a summary. Rubric Code: H77842 By terrilclark Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Industry Interview Enter rubric description
	Did Not Complete 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Paper Structure 20 % One-page, correct grammar, APA format	Did Not Complete	Poor The paper was not one-page, did not use correct grammar, nor APA format	Fair The paper was not a single page, it had many grammatical errors, and did not follow APA format	Good The paper had a minimal grammatical errors, APA was slightly wrong, and it was one-page	Excellent The Paper was one page, there were non-grammatical errors, and it was in APA format.
Career Path 20 % Would like working in that specific position or business?	Did Not Complete	Poor Did not provide detail or reasoning.	Fair There was little details and it was unclear.	Good Overall was good, may lack in details or was not fully clear.	Excellent Provided details to support the answer. It was clear and concise
Method to Stay in Touch 20 % How do you plan to keep in touch with the person. Do you want to work for the person in the future? You should detail the tools and time-frame of communication so that they remember you. Start from when you plan to send out the thank-you card or email.	Did Not Complete	Poor The plan did not have any details.	Fair The plan had minimal details	Good The plan was overall good, but may lack in details, of specific times	Excellent The Plan was very detailed; clear and concise.
Interview Questions 40 % The reponses from the interview need to show thought. So be sure to ask for details from your interviewee	Did Not Complete	Poor The answers were not sufficient	Fair The answers lacked detail	Good The answers were overall good, but some could bee improved.	Excellent The answers were very detailed.