Skip to main content
iRubric: Art History Musuem Object Rubric

iRubric: Art History Musuem Object Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Art History Musuem Object Rubric 
Art History Research Paper Rubric
Formal Analysis Assignment for GARTH 205
Rubric Code: H6CAW4
By purvislr
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

100 pts

Very Good

89 pts

Average

79 pts

Undeveloped

65 pts

Unacceptable

55 pts

Summary & Submission
25 %

NOTE:

You will receive a failing grade for the paper if you do not cite your work.
Excellent

- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is coherent and well supported by referenced source
- Includes one source
- Submitted completed handout on time and signed in at the museum
Very Good

- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is coherent and supported by referenced source
- Includes one source
- Submitted completed handout on time and signed in at the museum
Average

- Student demonstrates a limited ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is vague, but object is fully described
- Includes one source
- Submitted handout incomplete or not on due date; signed in at the museum
Undeveloped

- Student demonstrates little or no ability to use resources and is unable to clearly describe the object
- Includes one source
- Submitted handout incomplete or not on due date; signed in at the museum
Unacceptable

- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
- No source included
- Handout not submitted; student did not sign in at the museum
Content & Development
25 %

Excellent

- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Clear and well integrated formal description of art connects to analysis and references historical content
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Very Good

- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Clear formal description of art to support analysis and references historical content
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Average

- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Description included but vague. Historical content is lacking.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Undeveloped

- Art not fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Content is incomplete.
- Formal description included but vague
- Historical content missing
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Unacceptable

- Art not identified and unacceptable.
- No formal descriptions
- Student did not follow assignment guidelines
Organization & Structure
25 %

Excellent

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Handout is thoughtfully completed
- Writing conveys careful observation
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Very Good

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
-Writing conveys careful observation
- Handout is thoughtfully completed
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Handout complete
- Descriptions suggest lack of detailed observation
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Undeveloped

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Descriptions are vague and indicate lack of detailed observation
- Handout incomplete
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
- Conclusion is missing.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- No identifiable thesis.
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
- Student did not sign in at the museum
Format & Length
15 %

Excellent

- Paper follows Chicago format includes a footnote.
- Paper fulfills length requirements
-Format enhances readability of paper.
- Font and spacing correct
Very Good

- Paper follows Chicago format and uses a footnote.
- Paper fulfills length requirements
- Occasional footnote error (such as one or two missing page numbers)
Average

- Paper follows a citation style, some errors. Note is not in footnote form.
- Paper is over or under word length.
-Text or footnotes are not formatted correctly
Undeveloped

- Paper does not follow any citation style, citations are not in footnote form.
- Paper is inadequate or excessive in length.
-Paper is not double spaced
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Paper does not follow a citation style.
-Footnote is missing
- Student did not follow assignment guidelines
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
10 %

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Average

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Undeveloped

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202