Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Vocal Performance Duets rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Vocal Performance Duets
Vocal Performance Exam
Rubric Code:
H58WA9
By
marbis
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Music
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Vocal Performance Exam
Unacceptable
0 pts
Poor
10 pts
Fair
15 pts
Good
20 pts
Excellent
25 pts
Rhythmic Accuracy
Unacceptable
Incorrect rhythms consistently occur significantly detracting from the overall performance. Rhythms generally unrecognizable.
Poor
Incorrect rhythms frequently occur detracting from the overall performance.
Fair
Incorrect rhythms occasionally occur detracting from the overall performance.
Good
Incorrect rhythms rarely occur without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent
Rhythms are consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall prformance. Professional level rhythmic accuracy.
Pitch Accuracy
Unacceptable
Incorrect pitches consistently occur significantly detracting from the overall performance. Pitches generally unrecognizable.
Poor
Incorrect pitches frequently occur detracting from the overall performance.
Fair
Incorrect pitches occasionally occur detracting from the overall performance.
Good
Incorrect pitches rarely occur without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent
Pitches are consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall performance. Professional level pitch accuracy.
Intonation
Unacceptable
Intonation is never accurate, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor
Intonation is rarely accurate, detracting from the overall performance.
Fair
Intonation is usually accurate, but detracting from the overall performance.
Good
Intonation is usually accurate without detracting for the overall performance.
Excellent
Intonation is consistently accurate during performance. Professional level intonation.
Phrasing
Unacceptable
Incorrect phrasing significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor
Incorrect phrasing frequently occur which is detracting from the performance.
Fair
Incorrect phrasing ocassionaly occur detracting from the performance.
Good
Incorrect phrasing rarely occurs without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent
Phrasing is consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall performance. Professional level phrasing.
Diction
Unacceptable
Vowels are consistently inaccurate, consonants are consistently unclear, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor
Vowels are frequently inaccurate, consonants are frequently unclear, detracting from the performance.
Fair
Vowels are occasionally inaccurate, consonants are occasionally unclear, detracting from the performance.
Good
Vowels are rarely inaccurate, consonants are rarely unclear without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent
Vowels are stable and consistent; consonants are clear, crisp and appropriate to the language being sung enhancing the overall performance. Professional level diction.
Tone Quality
Unacceptable
Tone is never focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor
Tone is rarely focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, detracting from the overall performance.
Fair
Tone is mostly focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, detracting from the overall performance.
Good
Tone is usually focused, clear, centered and ringing tone throughout the dynamic range without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent
Tone is consistently focused, clear, centered and ringing tone throught the dynamic range enhancing the overall performance. Professional tone quality.
Dynamics
Unacceptable
Dynamics are never accurate significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor
Dynamics are rarely accurate within the ensemble, detracting from the overall performance.
Fair
Dynamics are sometimes accurate detracting from the overall performance.
Good
Dynamcis are usually accurate without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent
Dynamics are consistently accurate enhancing the overall performance. Professional level dynamics.
Breathing Technique
Unacceptable
Breath mechanics are never employed, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor
Breath mechanics are rarely employed, detracting from the overall performance.
Fair
Breath mechanics are often employed, but detract from the overall performance.
Good
Breath mechanics are usually employed, without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent
Breath mechanics are consistently employed enhancing the overall performance. Professional level technique.
Performance
Unacceptable
Performers do not sing from memory and do not communicate the emotion of the piece significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor
Performers occasionally sing from memory and occasionally communicate the emotion of the piece detracting from the overall performance.
Fair
Performers sing from memory, occasionally communicating the emotinal sense of the piece, detracting from the overall performance.
Good
Performers sing from memory, usually communicating the emotional sense of the piece without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent
Performers sing from memory, communicating the emotional sense of the piece at all times. Professional level performance.
Posture/Allignment
Unacceptable
Student exhibits an unbalanced, rigid, and inflexible posture throught all of the performance.
Poor
Student exhibits an unbalanced, rigid, and inflexible posture throught some of the performance.
Fair
Student exhibits a balanced, free, and flexible posture throught some of the performance. At times posture becomes rigid.
Good
Student exhibits a balanced, free and flexible posture throughout most of the performance.
Excellent
Student exhibits a balanced, free and flexible posture throughout the performance.
Ensemble
Unacceptable
Performers were not able to work together at all. Harmony produced was incorrect. Unable to alternate between performers. No connection between performers.
Poor
Performers were able to work together a bit. Harmony produced was mostly inaccurate. Rarely able to alternate between performers.
Rarely a connection between performers.
Fair
Performers were able to work together some of the time. Harmony produced was mostly accurate. Able to alternate between performers somewhat successfully. Some connection between performers.
Good
Performers worked well together. Harmony produced was accurate. Able to alternate between performers successfully. The connection between the performers was evident.
Excellent
Performers worked exceptionally well together. Harmony produced was extremely good. The connection between the performers was highly evident.
Subjects:
Music
Types:
Exam
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Music rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.