Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Oral Team Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Oral Team Presentation
Oral Team Presentation
This rubric will be used to evaluate students' teaching ability while delivering a 15-20 minute presentation of a prepared lesson plan on a provided topic.
Rubric Code:
H58896
By
kc05kc
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Business
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Oral Presentation
Poor
65 pts
Fair
75 pts
Good
85 pts
Excellent
100 pts
Teaching Content
40 %
Poor
The teaching lesson is very difficult to follow.
It is difficult to grasp the the content in the lesson taught.
There appears to be little or no organization or preparation.
Fair
There is little demonstrated organization of the lesson taught
There are parts of the lesson that are clear and easy to follow.
Improvement could be made with more preparation.
Good
The order of the lesson was easy to follow.
The presenter was well organized in their thought pattern.
The presenter was well prepared.
Excellent
There was a preview of main objectives of the lesson.
The presenter was well prepared.
The speaker presented in a clear confident manner
The presentation followed a very well prepared lesson plan.
Verbal communication skills
10 %
Poor
The presenter was unable to communicate effectively in English due to a limited vocabulary.
The presenter had many distracting speech transitions.
The presenter had poor projection.
The presenter had an inappropriate rate of delivery.
Fair
The presenter had trouble communicating effectively in English due to a limited vocabulary.
The presenter had several distracting speech transitions.
The presenter had poor elocution.
The presenter did not manage time well.
Good
The presenter had some problems in communicating effectively in English.
The presenter had few speech transitions.
The presenter projected their voice well.
The presenter managed time well.
Excellent
The presenter was able to communicate effectively in English.
The presenter had no distracting transitions.
The volume of the presenter was appropriate.
The rate of delivery was appropriate.
Time was managed well.
Non-verbal communication skills
10 %
Poor
Presenter had many distracting mannerisms.
Presenter made poor eye contact.
Posture and placement were poor.
Fair
The presenter had several distracting mannerisms.
Used hand gestures excessively.
Moved around too much or too little.
Good
The presenter had few distracting mannerisms.
Used hand gestures effectively.
Appropriate amount of eye contact.
Excellent
The presenter had no distracting mannerisms.
Presenter had excellent command of stage.
Presenter utilized gestures and facial expressions well.
Use of Visuals
10 %
Poor
No presentation was used AND without the visuals, it was difficult to follow the talk.
Fair
Presentation was disjointed with many typos and/or spelling error.
Good
Presentation was cohesive but contained typos and/or spelling errors. Slides were crowded with text.
Excellent
Presentation was cohesive with no typos and/or spelling errors. Slides were easy to read and follow.
Intros, Transitions and Conclusion
10 %
Poor
No signs of preparation and practice in the team. Difficult transitions between team members. Disorganized hand-offs. No compelling intro or conclusion.
Fair
Evidence of little preparation and practice in team. Order was followed but jumped around. Intro or conclusion was included but not both.
Good
Evidence of good preparation and practice. Strong intro or conclusion but not both. Team members were generally prepared for their parts.
Excellent
Strong evidence of good preparation and practice. Both intro and conclusions were compelling. Transitions between speakers were seamless.
Enter Title
20 %
Team Participation
Poor
Student did not participate with the team to develop this presentation. NOTE: Student will actually receive 0 points for the entire project.
Fair
Student did not participate routinely with the team to develop this presentation. Work was consistently submitted late and/or of poor quality causing re-work.
Good
Student participated in the project and produced good work that was on-time but not both.
Excellent
Student participated fully in the project producing good-quality work that was always on time. Team members would work with person again.
Keywords:
business, team, presentation
Subjects:
Business
Education
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.