iRubric: Composition Project: Oral Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Composition Project: Oral Presentation Rubric Code: H5885A By Sutehoot Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Music Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Content 40 % (weighted 60 percent for individuals)	Poor The group gives no idea of how the piece was written.	Fair It is not clear how the piece was written. There are no musical examples and no explanation of the arrangement.	Good The presentation gives a general picture of how the piece was written. It might present too much about one aspect while leaving out others. There are few musical examples or there is little explanation of the arrangement	Excellent The presentation gives a clear picture of how the piece was written, from inspiration through to finished product. Musical examples are played and explained. The arrangement is explained.
Use of media/styles of presentation 20 % (weighted 30 percent for individuals)	Poor The group only talks.	Fair The group only uses one or two styles of presentation to help explain their compositional process.	Good There are still several modes of presentation, but some of them are used inappropriately or they do not add to a clearer picture of the compositional process.	Excellent There are several modes of presentation. The presenters use not just spoken word, but play their instruments/sing, use recordings of other artists that influenced them, etc. to give a clear idea of how the piece of written
Time 10 %	Poor 2-4 minutes (less than 2 for individual)	Fair 4-6 minutes (2-4 for individual)	Good 6-8 minutes (4-6 for individual)	Excellent 8-10 minutes (6-8 for individual)
Group Involvement 30 %	Poor One or two people carry the group. It is unclear how involved everyone was in the compositional process.	Fair Some of the members do not give an explanation of their part or how they contributed to the compositional process.	Good Most of the members give an equal explanation of their part. It might be slightly unclear how some members contributed to the compositional process.	Excellent All members give an equal explanation of their part and give a clear idea of how they contributed to the compositional process.