Skip to main content
iRubric: Biomes Presentation: ____________________________ rubric

iRubric: Biomes Presentation: ____________________________ rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Biomes Presentation: ____________________________ 
Human Impact Glogster Poster
Rubric Code: H4B575
By anorthrup
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric .
  .

(N/A)

.

(N/A)

.

(N/A)

.

(N/A)

.

(N/A)

Content
  Superior

50 pts

Excellent

43 pts

Good

36 pts

Fair

29 pts

Poor

22 pts

Content Accuracy - 50%

Superior

The presentation includes accurate information about the 5 topics. The information is thorough and well-written.
* Location
* Climate
* Plants and Animals
* Food Chain
Excellent

The presentation includes accurate information about 5 topics. The information about 1-2 topics is missing enough detail, but the information is well-written.
Good

The presentation includes accurate information about most topics, but has some minor errors. The information about 1-2 topics is missing enough detail, but the text are well-written.
Fair

The presentation includes accurate information about some topics, but has a several major errors. The information about 2-3 topics is missing enough detail.
Poor

The presentation includes accurate information about some topics, but has many major errors. The information about 3-4 topics is missing enough detail.
Attrractiveness & Mechanics
  Superior

10 pts

Excellent

8 pts

Good

6 pts

Fair

4 pts

Poor

2 pts

Graphics - 10%

Superior

Graphics are related to the purpose of the presentation, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Excellent

Graphics are related to the purpose of the presentation, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or
understanding.
Good

Graphics are related to the purpose of the presentation, and are of acceptable quality.
Fair

Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, or distract the reader.
Poor

Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, and distract the reader.
Attractiveness - 10%

Superior

The presentation is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.
Excellent

The presentation is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.
Good

The presentation is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy.
Fair

The presentation is messy and poorly designed but still has some coordination to the design.
Poor

The presentation is distractingly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive.
Mechanics - 10%

Superior

Capitalisation and punctuation are correct throughout the poster. Spelling represents the student's best effort.
Excellent

There is 1-2 error in capitalisation, punctuation, or spelling.
Good

There are 3-4 errors in capitalisation, punctuation, or spelling.
Fair

There are 5-6 errors in capitalisation, punctuation, or spelling.
Poor

There are more than 6 errors in capitalisation, punctuation, or spelling.
Group Work - 10%

Superior

Used time well during each class period. Focused on getting the project done. Never distracted others and did a fair share of the work.
Excellent

Used time well during most class periods. Focused on getting the project done. Never distracted others and did a mostly fair share of the work.
Good

Used time well during most class periods. Focused on getting the project done. Sometimes distracted others and may not have done a fair share of the work.
Fair

Used time well during about half of class periods. Sometimes distracted others. Often had a negative impact on the group and had trouble doing a fair share of the work.
Poor

Used time well during less than half of class periods. Often distracted others and had a negative impact on the group. Did not do a fair share of the work.
Presentation - 10%

Superior

Made eye contact with audience more than 75% of presentation, refrained from reading directly from the text, demonstrated a clear understanding of the material.
Excellent

Made eye contact with audience more than 50% of presentation, refrained from reading directly from the text, demonstrated a reasonable understanding of the material.
Good

Made eye contact with audience more than 50% of presentation, sometimes read directly from the text, demonstrated a reasonable understanding of the material.
Fair

Made eye contact with audience less than 50% of presentation, often read directly from the text, demonstrated a limited understanding of the material
Poor

Made little eye contact with audience, mostly read directly from the text, demonstrated a very limited understanding of the material





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232