Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Biomes Presentation: ____________________________ rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Biomes Presentation: ____________________________
Human Impact Glogster Poster
Rubric Code:
H4B575
By
anorthrup
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
.
.
(N/A)
.
(N/A)
.
(N/A)
.
(N/A)
.
(N/A)
Content
Superior
50 pts
Excellent
43 pts
Good
36 pts
Fair
29 pts
Poor
22 pts
Content Accuracy - 50%
Superior
The presentation includes accurate information about the 5 topics. The information is thorough and well-written.
* Location
* Climate
* Plants and Animals
* Food Chain
Excellent
The presentation includes accurate information about 5 topics. The information about 1-2 topics is missing enough detail, but the information is well-written.
Good
The presentation includes accurate information about most topics, but has some minor errors. The information about 1-2 topics is missing enough detail, but the text are well-written.
Fair
The presentation includes accurate information about some topics, but has a several major errors. The information about 2-3 topics is missing enough detail.
Poor
The presentation includes accurate information about some topics, but has many major errors. The information about 3-4 topics is missing enough detail.
Attrractiveness & Mechanics
Superior
10 pts
Excellent
8 pts
Good
6 pts
Fair
4 pts
Poor
2 pts
Graphics - 10%
Superior
Graphics are related to the purpose of the presentation, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Excellent
Graphics are related to the purpose of the presentation, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or
understanding.
Good
Graphics are related to the purpose of the presentation, and are of acceptable quality.
Fair
Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, or distract the reader.
Poor
Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, and distract the reader.
Attractiveness - 10%
Superior
The presentation is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.
Excellent
The presentation is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.
Good
The presentation is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy.
Fair
The presentation is messy and poorly designed but still has some coordination to the design.
Poor
The presentation is distractingly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive.
Mechanics - 10%
Superior
Capitalisation and punctuation are correct throughout the poster. Spelling represents the student's best effort.
Excellent
There is 1-2 error in capitalisation, punctuation, or spelling.
Good
There are 3-4 errors in capitalisation, punctuation, or spelling.
Fair
There are 5-6 errors in capitalisation, punctuation, or spelling.
Poor
There are more than 6 errors in capitalisation, punctuation, or spelling.
Group Work - 10%
Superior
Used time well during each class period. Focused on getting the project done. Never distracted others and did a fair share of the work.
Excellent
Used time well during most class periods. Focused on getting the project done. Never distracted others and did a mostly fair share of the work.
Good
Used time well during most class periods. Focused on getting the project done. Sometimes distracted others and may not have done a fair share of the work.
Fair
Used time well during about half of class periods. Sometimes distracted others. Often had a negative impact on the group and had trouble doing a fair share of the work.
Poor
Used time well during less than half of class periods. Often distracted others and had a negative impact on the group. Did not do a fair share of the work.
Presentation - 10%
Superior
Made eye contact with audience more than 75% of presentation, refrained from reading directly from the text, demonstrated a clear understanding of the material.
Excellent
Made eye contact with audience more than 50% of presentation, refrained from reading directly from the text, demonstrated a reasonable understanding of the material.
Good
Made eye contact with audience more than 50% of presentation, sometimes read directly from the text, demonstrated a reasonable understanding of the material.
Fair
Made eye contact with audience less than 50% of presentation, often read directly from the text, demonstrated a limited understanding of the material
Poor
Made little eye contact with audience, mostly read directly from the text, demonstrated a very limited understanding of the material
Subjects:
Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.