Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Electronic presentation and oral presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Electronic presentation and oral presentation rubric
Electronic presentation and oral presentation rubric
The candidate(s) will put together an electronic presentation to show during the oral presentation. The group's oral presentation must be aligned with the electronic presentation.
Rubric Code:
H3X22C
By
Krmunger
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project/Presentation
6
Exceeds
10 pts
5
Good
6 pts
4
Fair
4 pts
3
Poor
2 pts
2
No attempt except research in class.
0 pts
Effective Use of Technology
15 %
6
The electronic presentation includes all information relevant to the topic in an organized fashion.
5
The electronic presentation includes all relevant information; however, is not well-organized.
4
Does not have all of the relevant information in the electronic presentation. There is not enough information presented. Information is presented in an unorganized fashion.
3
The electronic presentation is lacking in elements required. There are many gaps in information presented.
2
The candidate made no attempt.
Work quality/effort
20 %
6
The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the candidate is proud of his/her work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the candidate.
5
The work was done with good effort that shows the necessary level of candidate competence. It is evident that time was put into this electronic presentation and oral presentation.
4
Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not the necessary level of candidate competence. It is evident that the work was rushed.
3
Work is done with little effort, quality is not to the level required by the qualified candidate. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
2
The candidate made no attempt.
Style/Mechanics
15 %
6
The electronic presentation has an element of creativity and style, and is not just a list of facts. The electronic presentation is presented in a clear and concise manner with full under-standing of the subject.
5
The electronic presentation is clear and logical and contains facts as well as very few mistakes. Good clear oral presentation.
4
The electronic presentation lacks style and reads more like a list of facts than a support for an oral presentation. The electronic presentation lacks neatness and clarity
3
The poster lacks a clear under-standing of the subject matter and there are many errors. Electronic presentation is not creative.
2
The candidate made no attempt.
Content
30 %
6
The candidate presented the information clearly and displays a complete understanding of their information. It is evident that the candidate was well prepared.
5
The candidate presented the information fairly clearly and display a reasonable under-standing of their information.
4
The information presented is not clearly displayed throughout the project
3
Not enough preparation was done for the presentation of the information, it therefore lacks many elements of what is expected.
2
The candidate made no attempt.
Interatcive/Collaborative & Assess.
20 %
6
Participants were fully engaged throughout the presentation. Expectations were clear, activities were age appropriate, interaction was required, and learning was assessed.
5
Participants were fully engaged throughout the presentation. Expectations were clear, and accomplishment of these expectations were clearly assessed. Yet, it is unclear how these activities supported the overall learning of the presentation.
4
Participant activities were engaging, interesting, and even fun. Expectations were unclear, or assessment was not directly related to the stated expectations or learning outcomes.
3
Participant activities were poorly explained, unclear, or were not age appropriate for the intended student audience; activities did not accomplish the overall learning outcomes of the presentation, or assessment was not included.
2
The candidate made no attempt at engagement, activity, interactivity, participant collaboration, or the necessary assessment of student learning
Keywords:
job applicant candidate presentation electronic and oral
Subjects:
English
Geology
Social Sciences
Vocational
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.