- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Explanatory Writing rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Explanatory Writing The student will write an essay describing how to be a good neighbor. Rubric Code: H3AXWA By pduchesne Draft Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Being a Good Neighbor Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Introduction Enter criteria description	Poor No introduction is used.	Fair An introduction is used. It includes the main idea but does not include three main points.	Good Intoduction is used. It includes the main idea and three main points.
Main point one Treat them kindly	Poor No paragraph for MP1.	Fair MP1 paragraph has topic sentence and 1-2 detail sentences.	Good MP1 paragraph has topic sentence and at least three to five detail sentences.
Main point two Do personal things for them	Poor No paragraph for MP2.	Fair MP2 paragraph has topic sentence and 1-2 detail sentences.	Good MP2 paragraph has topic sentence and at least three to five detail sentences.
Main point three Do household or yard chores for them	Poor No paragraph for MP3.	Fair MP3 paragraph has topic sentence and 1-2 detail sentences.	Good MP3 paragraph has topic sentence and at least three to five detail sentences.
Closing	Poor No closing is used.	Fair A closing is used. It includes the main idea but does not include three main points.	Good A closing is used. It includes the main idea and three main points; however, it says it differently than introduction.
Conventions	Poor Many captialization, punctuation, or spelling errors.	Fair Several captialization, punctuation, or spelling errors.	Good Few if any captialization, punctuation, or spelling errors.
Voice	Poor The paper really has no personality. It doesn't sound like anybody. There is a weak sense of audience.	Fair I can tell that you have put some of your personality into this paper. You are aware of your audience.	Good You have written with your audience in mind. The paper reads as if you are talking directly to the audience.