Skip to main content
iRubric: Musical Project Assessment rubric

iRubric: Musical Project Assessment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Musical Project Assessment 
Musical Project Assessment
Assess musical project work in class, musical presentation and composer presentation.
Rubric Code: H3A357
By mmcconkey
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Musical Project
  Needs Improvement

60 pts

Poor

70 pts

Fair

80 pts

Good

90 pts

Excllent

100 pts

Work in class

Needs Improvement

Did not do any work on project in class. Did not stay on task or follow directions. Did not bring any materials to class.
Poor

Only worked on project in class a little bit. Had a hard time staying on task and following directions. Brought materials to class once or twice.
Fair

Worked on project in class some times. Had a hard time staying on task and following directions. Brought some materials to class to work on project.
Good

Worked on project in class most of the time. Usually stayed on task and followed directions. Brought materials to class to work on project most days.
Excllent

Worked on project in class every day. Stayed on task and followed directions. Brought materials to class to work on project every day.
Work with partner

Needs Improvement

Did not work well with partner. Was absent most of the time. Did not do any work on the project.
Poor

Had a hard time working with partner. Was absent many days. One partner did more work than the other.
Fair

Had a hard time working with partner. Was in class some of the time. One partner did more work than the other.
Good

Worked pretty well with partner. Was in class most of the time to help with the project. Each partner did some work on project.
Excllent

Worked well with partner. Was in class every day to help with the project. Each partner did equal work on project.
Poster presentation

Needs Improvement

Only one partner did the presenting. Presentation was not well planned out and was not well presented.
Poor

One partner did most of the presenting. Presentation was not well planned out, and had a hard time presenting.
Fair

Each partner took time to present. Each partner knew what they were going to talk about, but had a hard time with their presentation.
Good

Each partner did some presenting. Each partner had a plan for the presentation and knew for the most part what they were going to talk about.
Excllent

Each partner did equal time poster. Each partner had a well planned presentation and knew what they were going to talk about.
Composer presentation

Needs Improvement

Did not have note cards. Was not well presented. Had no plan for what was presented. Was not informative and not accurate.
Poor

Had note cards but nothing written on them. Had a hard time presenting. Was not real sure of what was presented. Lacked some information or was not real accurate.
Fair

Had note cards but not much written on them. Was presented okay. Had an idea of what was presented. Was informative and accurate.
Good

Had note cards. Was pretty well presented. Had a plan of what was presented. Was pretty well
informative and accurate.
Excllent

Had good note cards. Was well presented. Had a good plan of what was presented. Was very informative and accurate.
Composer paper

Needs Improvement

Paper is not the correct length and poorly written. Paper is missing a composer or written about the wrong person.
Poor

Paper is not the correct length and does not have correct grammar. Paper is not very informative. Paper is written about the wrong person.
Fair

Paper is not correct length and has some grammar mistakes. Paper is informative. Paper is missing a composer.
Good

Paper is correct length, but has some grammar mistakes. Paper is informative and well written. Paper is written about the correct composer or composers.
Excllent

Paper is correct length with correct grammar. Paper is very informative and well written. Paper is written about the correct composer or composers.
Musical poster

Needs Improvement

Poster is missing most of the requirements. It is evident that not much work was done on the poster.
Poor

Poster is missing some requirements. It is evident that not much work was done on the poster.
Fair

Poster has all requirements. It is evident that some work was done on the poster.
Good

Poster has all requirements and looks pretty good. It is evident that there was some work done on the poster.
Excllent

Poster has all requirements and is pleasing to the eye. It is evident that a lot a work was done on the poster.
Peer Evaluations
  Needs Improvement

10 pts

Poor

15 pts

Good

20 pts

Excellent

25 pts

Superior

30 pts

Student Evaluations

Needs Improvement

Received a 10 or below from most students.
Poor

Received a 15 from most students.
Good

Received a 20 from most students.
Excellent

Received a 25 from most students.
Superior

Received a 30 from most students.
Partner Evaluations

Needs Improvement

Received a 10 or below from most students.
Poor

Received a 15 from most students.
Good

Received a 20 from most students.
Excellent

Received a 25 from most students.
Superior

Received a 30 from most students.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232