Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Musical Project Assessment rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Musical Project Assessment
Musical Project Assessment
Assess musical project work in class, musical presentation and composer presentation.
Rubric Code:
H3A357
By
mmcconkey
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Music
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Musical Project
Needs Improvement
60 pts
Poor
70 pts
Fair
80 pts
Good
90 pts
Excllent
100 pts
Work in class
Needs Improvement
Did not do any work on project in class. Did not stay on task or follow directions. Did not bring any materials to class.
Poor
Only worked on project in class a little bit. Had a hard time staying on task and following directions. Brought materials to class once or twice.
Fair
Worked on project in class some times. Had a hard time staying on task and following directions. Brought some materials to class to work on project.
Good
Worked on project in class most of the time. Usually stayed on task and followed directions. Brought materials to class to work on project most days.
Excllent
Worked on project in class every day. Stayed on task and followed directions. Brought materials to class to work on project every day.
Work with partner
Needs Improvement
Did not work well with partner. Was absent most of the time. Did not do any work on the project.
Poor
Had a hard time working with partner. Was absent many days. One partner did more work than the other.
Fair
Had a hard time working with partner. Was in class some of the time. One partner did more work than the other.
Good
Worked pretty well with partner. Was in class most of the time to help with the project. Each partner did some work on project.
Excllent
Worked well with partner. Was in class every day to help with the project. Each partner did equal work on project.
Poster presentation
Needs Improvement
Only one partner did the presenting. Presentation was not well planned out and was not well presented.
Poor
One partner did most of the presenting. Presentation was not well planned out, and had a hard time presenting.
Fair
Each partner took time to present. Each partner knew what they were going to talk about, but had a hard time with their presentation.
Good
Each partner did some presenting. Each partner had a plan for the presentation and knew for the most part what they were going to talk about.
Excllent
Each partner did equal time poster. Each partner had a well planned presentation and knew what they were going to talk about.
Composer presentation
Needs Improvement
Did not have note cards. Was not well presented. Had no plan for what was presented. Was not informative and not accurate.
Poor
Had note cards but nothing written on them. Had a hard time presenting. Was not real sure of what was presented. Lacked some information or was not real accurate.
Fair
Had note cards but not much written on them. Was presented okay. Had an idea of what was presented. Was informative and accurate.
Good
Had note cards. Was pretty well presented. Had a plan of what was presented. Was pretty well
informative and accurate.
Excllent
Had good note cards. Was well presented. Had a good plan of what was presented. Was very informative and accurate.
Composer paper
Needs Improvement
Paper is not the correct length and poorly written. Paper is missing a composer or written about the wrong person.
Poor
Paper is not the correct length and does not have correct grammar. Paper is not very informative. Paper is written about the wrong person.
Fair
Paper is not correct length and has some grammar mistakes. Paper is informative. Paper is missing a composer.
Good
Paper is correct length, but has some grammar mistakes. Paper is informative and well written. Paper is written about the correct composer or composers.
Excllent
Paper is correct length with correct grammar. Paper is very informative and well written. Paper is written about the correct composer or composers.
Musical poster
Needs Improvement
Poster is missing most of the requirements. It is evident that not much work was done on the poster.
Poor
Poster is missing some requirements. It is evident that not much work was done on the poster.
Fair
Poster has all requirements. It is evident that some work was done on the poster.
Good
Poster has all requirements and looks pretty good. It is evident that there was some work done on the poster.
Excllent
Poster has all requirements and is pleasing to the eye. It is evident that a lot a work was done on the poster.
Peer Evaluations
Needs Improvement
10 pts
Poor
15 pts
Good
20 pts
Excellent
25 pts
Superior
30 pts
Student Evaluations
Needs Improvement
Received a 10 or below from most students.
Poor
Received a 15 from most students.
Good
Received a 20 from most students.
Excellent
Received a 25 from most students.
Superior
Received a 30 from most students.
Partner Evaluations
Needs Improvement
Received a 10 or below from most students.
Poor
Received a 15 from most students.
Good
Received a 20 from most students.
Excellent
Received a 25 from most students.
Superior
Received a 30 from most students.
Subjects:
Music
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Music rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.