Skip to main content
iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Digital Stories for Change rubric

iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Digital Stories for Change rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Missouri FCCLA Digital Stories for Change 
This rubric is for the Missouri FCCLA state contest, Digital Stories for Change. The contest is open to Missouri FCCLA members only. Information found at www.mofccla.org
Rubric Code: H38979
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric MoFCCLA Digital Stories for Change
Participants make a digital story presentation about an issue concerning families, careers, or communities. The digital story is both a process and a product. As a process, the digital story builds skills in reflection and critical thinking, writing, presentation skills, and multimedia production. As a product, the digital story may be used for encouraging change in family, career and community systems.
 

0 pts


1 pts


2 pts


3 pts


4 pts

Relationship
Relationship to Family, Career or Community. If project did not meet the issue requirement, it can be scored but will receive an automatic 10 point deduction, to be deducted from the final score. Not a demonstration or how-to presentation.
Time or Size Specification
If project did not meet the time specification, it can be scored but will receive an automatic 5 point deduction, to be deducted from the final score.
Project Identification Page
0.5 pts

Must be posted online for viewing, not part of the video.

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

Not posted on website or wiki.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

Posted but missing one or more requirements.
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

Includes participant name(s), school, city, state, FCCLA region, title of project, and story summary sheet.
Use of FCCLA Planning Process
1 pts

A summary page of the planning process must be posted on the website or wiki.

0 ( x 1 pts)

Not included.
1 ( x 1 pts)

1 or 2 steps summarized. Planning process relationship to project is weak.
2 ( x 1 pts)

3 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are generally reflected in project.
3 ( x 1 pts)

4 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are seen in project.
4 ( x 1 pts)

All 5 steps summarized. Planning process completed and relates to project.
Storyboarding
0.5 pts

Participants must include a project storyboard, using the digital format of their choice.

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

None posted on website or wiki.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

Storyboard was mostly followed.
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

Storyboard was followed and implemented to maximize the message of the story
Introduction
0.5 pts

(Video)

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

Introduction missing.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

Introduction weak and audience is confused.
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

Introduction is original and developed, audience is interested.
Purpose and Focus
0.5 pts

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

Purpose, focus and/or point of view is missing.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

Purpose, focus, and/or point of view is weak and difficult to figure out.
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

Establishes purpose, clear focus, and point of view early and maintains throughout the presentation.
Ending
0.5 pts

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

Ending is abrupt, weak, or missing.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

Ending somewhat developed but does not provide closure.
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

Ending is creative and closes the project well.
Subject Knowledge
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is not evident.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is not evident, information is confusing, incorrect, or insufficient.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is evident but information is confusing or insufficient.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is evident, most information is clear, appropriate and accurate.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is clearly evident. All information is clear, appropriate and accurate.
Creativity and Design
0.5 pts

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

No use of color, design, or effects to support the theme of the project.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

Minimal use of color, design, effects and original ideas. Theme not well supported.
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

Good use of color, design, effects, and original ideas to support theme.
Technical Quality - Sound
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No sound or music was used in the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Sound quality is poor (crackling, volume issues, etc.)
2 ( x 1 pts)

Sound quality if inconsistent in the project.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Sound quality is good throughout the project.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Sound quality is excellent throughout the project.
Technical Quality - Images/Video
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No images or video were used.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Images/video quality is poor (low resolution, size distortion)
2 ( x 1 pts)

Images/video quality is inconsistent in the project.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Images/video quality is good throughout the project.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Images/video quality is excellent - high resolution, no size distortion.
Technical Quality - Editing
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Editing produces a product difficult to watch or follow.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Inconsistent editing with under/over use of transitions and effects.
2 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 1 pts)

Good editing and overall production to support the story.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Excellent editing and production with smooth and effective transitions, use of effects supports the story.
Documentation
1 pts

Any music, photographs, text, trademarks, or names that are used in the project must be properly cited and documented. Must follow copyright and must follow school district rules for student privacy and use of photographs or student work.

0 ( x 1 pts)

No information provided on copyright or source citations.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright is questionable, sources are not cited.
2 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright statements and permissions are included, most sources are properly cited.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Work is original, or copyright statements and permissions are included, all sources are documented.
Licensing
0.5 pts

Must include a selected Creative Commons license or other statement regarding copyright of the participant(s) work.

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

The work was not licensed.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

The work has a Creative Commons license or copyright statement.
Graphic/Image Commication
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Very few images are used and are not relevant to the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video used do not match the storyline or enrich the project. Images not coordinated with music/sound.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video is inconsistently used and is not clearly matched with the storyline. Images not coordinated with music/sound.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images or video match most of the storyline, and communicate symbolism or metaphors. Images mostly coordinated with music/sound.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video creates emotion to match storyline, and communicate symbolism or metaphors. Images well coordinated with music/sound.
Text Communication
1 pts

The use of inappropriate music, graphics, or text will automatically disqualify the entry. Inappropriate matierals are those that are obscene, indecent, profane, or explicit.

0 ( x 1 pts)

No text was used in the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Choice of text, words, or graphics does not enhance the project, contains many errors.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Word, text, or graphic choices are appropriate but contain errors.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Word, text, or graphic choices are good and support the project ideas
4 ( x 1 pts)

Word, text or graphic choices are powerful, vivid, and descriptive to audience.
Voice/Music/Sound Communication
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No music or narrative was included.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Is not relevant, does not create interest or added meaning, quality of volume/diction/fluency/flow needs improvement. Music is distracting
2 ( x 1 pts)

Relevant to project but does not add meaning, quality of volume/diction/fluency/flow is acceptable. Music acceptable but not coordinated with images.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Enriches the project, creates interest, quality of volume/diction/fluency/flow is above average. Music is mostly coordinated with images.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Significantly enriches the project, creates appropriate mood/tone, quality of volume/diction/fluency/flow is high. Music is coordinated with images.



Keywords:
  • Missouri, FCCLA, Digital Storytelling

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232