Skip to main content
iRubric: Evidence-Based Paper/Case Study Research Paper rubric

iRubric: Evidence-Based Paper/Case Study Research Paper rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evidence-Based Paper/Case Study Research Paper 
Evidence-Based Paper/Case Study Research Paper
Rubric Code: H3247C
By Gigi0755
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric EBP /Case Study Paper
  Poor

(0-6.9)

(N/A)

Fair

(7-7.9)

(N/A)

Good

(8-8.9)

(N/A)

Excellent

(9-10)

(N/A)

Brief definition of illness and/or
10 %

Uses references from journals and/or book (No Internet Web Pages)
It can be based on previous Anatomy Paper with necessary corrections and editing
Poor

Provides very minimal information.
1-2 references only.

An identical copy of previous Anatomy paper without recommended corrections and/or inadequate editing for content will receive a
Fair

Provides some information about medical conditions. However leaves room for questions. Ex. Does not include variations or level of severity, prognosis, complications, and precautions.
Good

Provides most of the information about medical conditions. Includes problems frequently associated with the medical condition.

APA used at least 75% of the time
Excellent

Explains medical conditions clearly & detailed. Includes new information. For maximum points all references and paper (100%) need to be APA style.
Role of the occupational therapy pr
20 %

Evidence based practice literature MUST be included
Poor

Provides very minimal information. No evidence based references included. PAPER WILL BE RETURNED
Evidence-Based Practice provided. However poorly or not integrated in the paper
Fair

Provides some information about the role of the OT practitioner. Includes possible adjunctive, enabling, and purposeful activities. Minimal evidence-based practice provided (1-2 references), but effort to integrate information in the paper is recognizable.
Good

Explains the role of the OT practitioner along treatment continuum. Includes COTA role. Treatment approaches are included. Evidence-based practice research included. However, either not completely integrated in the paper, or presented in a separate section.
Excellent

Explains in detailed role of the OT practitioner along treatment continuum in different settings. Evidence practice research included and correctly integrated in the paper.
Case Study
20 %

Description of client in case study.
Problem list and strengths need to be included. Use of OTPF 2nd edition terminology is required (Problem.-Performance skills or body function affected)
Poor

Client is described briefly.
OTPF 2nd edition terminology not used or used incorrectly.
Fair

A clear picture of the client is presented. However, some elements of context and/or environment are not included.
Problem list and/or strengths is incomplete. (Less than 70%)
Good

All elements of client's context and environment are addressed. Good physical problem list and patient's strengths is presented. However, impact on the family or psychosocial issues have been omitted.
Excellent

Comprehensive analysis of patients strengths and problems with good use of OTPF 2nd edition terminology.
Treatment goals
20 %

Write 5 LTG (one needs to be an educational goal)and 1 STG for each LTG.
Poor

One or more goals are missing.
More than 50 % of the goals are lacking one or more of the important elements as reflected in the ABCDE model
Fair

10-49% of the goals are lacking one or more of the important elements as reflected in the ABCDE model
Good

1-9 % of the goals are lacking one or more of the important elements as reflected in the ABCDE model; or
goals contain all necessary elements, but two or more do not have specific meaning for the client.
Excellent

All goals are occupational based and are clear well written and meaningful for the client.
Treatment Implementation
20 %

Design one 60 min session demonstrating the use/progression of preparatory to purposeful activities. Rationale for decisions.
Poor

No clear beginning, middle, and end to treatment session. Treatment areas out of the scope of practice.
Fair

Clear beginning, middle, and end of treatment session. Activities correspond to problem list. Inconsistent support and analysis of activities/treatment utilized.
Good

Beginning, middle, and end to tx session well defined. Activities are described in detail and correspond to problem list
Excellent

Resources.
Utilizes pictures, diagrams, etc. to illustrate treatment.
Overall paper organization
10 %

Organization of content.
Includes grammar and spelling
Poor

Information scattered and disorganized. Grammar and spelling so poor, sections of paper are impossible to understand.

PAPER WILL BE RETURNED.
Fair

Information is orderly, but difficult to follow or information is frequently repeated. Grammar and spelling errors present, but paper is understandable
Good

Good format. Easy to follow and understand.
Less than 3 grammar or spelling errors.
Excellent

Excellent format, use of correct terminology. Concise and professional.
Less than 3 minor spelling errors.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232