Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Music Info-Graphic Chart rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Music Info-Graphic Chart
Classical Music Comparison Chart
10 Facts About A Composer
Rubric Code:
H2W9W32
By
iscore
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Music
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Info Graphic Chart
Poor
10 pts
Fair
30 pts
Good
50 pts
Very Good
80 pts
Excellent
100 pts
Work Quality/Effort
15 %
Poor
Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the student is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete. Only the textbook was used as a source.
Fair
Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the student is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed, and only one or two sources used.
Good
Work is done with good effort, but the quality is still not what the student is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed, and three or four sources used.
Very Good
The work was done with very good effort that shows what the student is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this presentation, using several sources.
Excellent
The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that all student used multiple sources to contribute to the project.
Chart Requirements
15 %
Poor
The chart is lacking in elements required and in resources used. There are many gaps in the information presented.
Fair
All but 1 of the required elements are included on the infographic.
Good
The chart includes some of the required elements. There is not enough information presented.
Very Good
The chart meets most of the required elements and includes a good comparison.
Excellent
The chart includes all required elements of the project and includes a clear, strong comparison. Goes beyond what was expected.
Appearance/Design
20 %
Poor
The infographic is distractingly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive
Fair
The infographic is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy
Good
The infographic is attractive in terms of design, layout, neatness and use of vocabulary
Very Good
The infographic is very attractive in terms of design, layout, neatness and use of vocabulary
Excellent
The infographic is exceptionally professional/ attractive in terms of design, layout, neatness and use of vocabulary and resources.
Graphics
15 %
Poor
Graphics do not relate to the topic.
Fair
All graphics relate to the topic.
Good
The chart is presented in a satisfactory manner. Not all parts are clear.
Very Good
The chart is well labeled, and is presented in a clear and concise manner. All graphics are related to the topic and most make it easier to understand.
Excellent
The chart has an element of creativity and style. It is well labeled and presented in a clear and concise manner. All graphics are related to the topic and most make it very easier to view and understand.
Content
35 %
Poor
-No details to support main idea
-Information is not accurate
-Information does not support the visual's purpose
-use of required terms missing
Fair
-Few details support main idea
-Lacking accurate information
-Inadequate information is not clearly supportive of visual's purpose
-Minimal use of required terms
Good
-Most details support main ideas
-Accurate information for almost all subject matter
-Information is mostly adequate and supportive of visual's purpose
-Accurate use of terms is missing
Very Good
-Appropriate details support main ideas
-Accurate and detailed information
-Information adequately supports purpose of visual
-Accurately uses the required terms
Excellent
-Excellent details support main ideas
-Excellent and accurate and detailed information
-Information adequately supports purpose of visual
-Excellent and accurately use of the required terms and music vocabulary
Keywords:
symphony, concerto, sonata, string quartets
Subjects:
History
Music
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.