Skip to main content
iRubric: Newspaper Article Oral Presentation rubric

iRubric: Newspaper Article Oral Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Newspaper Article Oral Presentation 
Evaluates the key components of an effective oral presentation. The facts section will also be used to evaluate the completeness of the written paper.
Rubric Code: H2W8CA8
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Oral Presentation Evaluation
  Excellent-Level 10-9

90-100%

(N/A)

Good-Level 8-7

70-89%

(N/A)

Fair-Level 6-5

41-69%

(N/A)

Poor-Level 4-3

0-40%

(N/A)

Facts- Information

Excellent-Level 10-9

Presenter gave clear and concise facts and explanations of how these facts support the topic of this presentation. The presenter did a summary of the article in his/her own words. The presenter was able to relate the relevance of the newspaper topic to Puerto Rico's government. The presenter gave their opinion and supporting facts.
Good-Level 8-7

Presenter gave concise facts and was somewhat complete with her explanations of how these facts support the topic of the presentation. The presenter only covered two of the three required parts (summary, relevance, opinion). The presenter gave supporting facts and information in their own words.
Fair-Level 6-5

Presenter failed to give complete facts and some were confusing as to how they supported the topic of the presentation. The presenter only covered one of the three required parts (summary, relevance, opinion). The presenter failed to give supporting facts. The presenter did use their own words in explaining the article.
Poor-Level 4-3

Presenter did not provide adequate facts or explanations. Did not relate to topic. The presenter failed to cover the 3 required parts (summary, relevance, opinion). The presenter failed to give supporting evidence and failed to use their own words in describing the article.
Organization

Excellent-Level 10-9

Presenter was extremely organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was easy to follow. Stays on topic throughout the presentation
Good-Level 8-7

Presenter was organized in the delivery of this presentation. For the most part it was not confusing to .follow.Somewhat stays on topic throughout the presentation
Fair-Level 6-5

Presenter was disorganized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was unclear and confusing to follow. Struggles to stay on topic.
Poor-Level 4-3

Presenter was extremely disorganized in the devlivery. Extremely unclear, unable to focus. Does not stay on topic. Completely disorganized.
Delivery of Presentation

Excellent-Level 10-9

Presenter was well prepared to give his or her presentation and was well rehearsed. Constant eye contact with audience and did not use q-cards.
Good-Level 8-7

Presenter was somewhat prepared to give his/her presentation but could have used more time to rehearse. Moderate eye contact and used of q-cards.
Fair-Level 6-5

Presenter was not prepared to give his/her presentation and needed more time to rehearse. Presenter struggled to avoid q-cards and very briefly gave eye contact.
Poor-Level 4-3

Presenter was not prepared to give the presentation and obviously did not rehearse at all. Relied heavily upon reading cards. No eye contact.
Ability to Answer Questions

Excellent-Level 10-9

Presenter was adequately able to answer all questions from the audience.
Good-Level 8-7

Presenter was able to answer some of the questions from the audience
Fair-Level 6-5

Presenter struggled to answer any of the questions but attempted to provide answers.
Poor-Level 4-3

Presenter was unable to answer any questions from the audience.
Question for the Class

Excellent-Level 10-9

The presenter was able to come up with a question for the class that related to the article and sparked discussion.
Good-Level 8-7

The presenter was able to come up with a question for the class relevant to the article but was not able to spark discussion for the class.
Fair-Level 6-5

The presenter did not come up with a question for the class and only summarized the article, told of it's relevance to Texas government and gave their opinion.
Poor-Level 4-3

The student failed to present all of their article and did not come up with a question for the class.



Keywords:
  • Oral presentation evaluation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202