Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: AP Spanish Lit - Single Text Analysis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
AP Spanish Lit - Single Text Analysis
AP Spanish Lit - Single Text Analysis
AP Spanish Literature Single Text Analysis
Rubric Code:
H24A39W
By
sramcdonald
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Single Text Analysis
Demonstrates Superiority
5 pts
Demonstrates Competence
4 pts
Suggests Competence
3 pts
Suggests Lack of Competence
2 pts
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
1 pts
Literary Features
Demonstrates Superiority
Thoroughly analyzes a variety of rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features.
Demonstrates Competence
Explains rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Competence
Describes some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Identifies some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text, but may not explain their relevance. Suggests a lack of understanding of the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Identifies some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text, but does not explain their relevance. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the text.
Contextual Knowledge
Demonstrates Superiority
Demonstrates superior understanding of literary, historical, sociocultural, and/or geopolitical contexts and its/their relationship to the text.
Demonstrates Competence
Explains how the text's content relates to the given literary, historical, sociocultural and/or geopolitical context(s).
Suggests Competence
Identifies features of the literary, historical, sociocultural, and/or geopolitical context(s). Attempts to explain the relevance of the context(s) to the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Identifies some features of the literary, historical, sociocultural, and/or geopolitical context(s). May not clearly identify contextual features represented in the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Identifies some features of the literary, historical, sociocultural, and/or geopolitical context(s) but does not explain the relevance to the text. Demonstrates lack of understanding of the context(s) or the text.
Knowledge of Movement and Genre
Demonstrates Superiority
Clearly understands the charateristics of the literary movement and (sub-)genre that are reflected in the text. Analyzes how the the characteristics of the movement and (sub-)genre effect the text.
Demonstrates Competence
Explains the characteristics of the literary movement and (sub-)genre and how the text reflects them.
Suggests Competence
Identifies features of the literary movement and the (sub-)genre. Attempts to explain their relevance to the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence
May not clearly identify the literary movement and/or the (sub-)genre. May not clearly explain how it/they are reflected in the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
May not clearly identify the literary movement and/or the (sub-)genre. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the literary movement and/or (sub-)genre and/or how it/they are reflected in the text.
Cultural Analysis
Demonstrates Superiority
Analyzes how cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text reflect the given context.
Demonstrates Competence
Explains how the cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text reflect the given context.
Suggests Competence
Identifies cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text but may not explain how culture is reflectedin the given context.
Suggests Lack of Competence
May not address cultural features found in the text or explanation of cultural products, practices, or perspectives may be unclear.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Does not address cultural products, practices, or perspectives. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of cultural features in the text.
Textual Examples
Demonstrates Superiority
Supports analysis by integrating specific, well-chosen textual examples throughout the response.
Demonstrates Competence
Supports analysis by citing and discussing appropriate textual examples.
Suggests Competence
Elaborates on main points and supports observations by citing examples; however, the examples may not always be clear and relevant.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Presents main points and some details, describes basic elements of the text, but may do so without citing examples or supporting an argument.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
May consist entirely of summary or paraphrasing of the text without citing examples.
Organization
Demonstrates Superiority
Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a cohesive and logical progression of ideas in a well-developed response.
Demonstrates Competence
Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Competence
Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), evidence of organization (a stated topic, an introduction, a conclusion), and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
May not clearly state a purpose or be organized around a central idea or argument; progression of ideas may not be logical.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Does not state a purpose, show evidence of organization, or offer a progression of ideas.
Balance and Focus
Demonstrates Superiority
Response has a clearly balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the movement/(sub-)genre.
Demonstrates Competence
Response has a reasonably balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the movement/(sub-)genre.
Suggests Competence
Response attempts to have a balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the movement/(sub-)genre. If the response has a significantly unbalanced focus, the analysis must be good to achieve this score.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Response has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the text, specified movement/(sub-)genre, or the given context.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Demonstrates lack of understanding and has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the text, specified movement/(sub-)genre, or the given context.
Language Use- Vocabulary
Demonstrates Superiority
Vocabulary is varied and appropriate to the text(s) being discussed,<BR>
presents main ideas and supporting details, and communicates some<BR>
nuances of meaning.
Demonstrates Competence
Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and presents<BR>
main ideas and some supporting details.
Suggests Competence
Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, but may be<BR>
limited to presenting some relevant ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Vocabulary may be inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and<BR>
forces the reader to supply inferences.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Vocabulary is insufficient and inappropriate to the text(s) being<BR>
discussed; errors render comprehension difficult.
Language Use- Grammar
Demonstrates Superiority
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is very good; use<BR>
of verb tenses and moods is generally accurate; word order and<BR>
formation are accurate; use of cohesive devices and transitional<BR>
elements or both is appropriate to guide understanding.
Demonstrates Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is good; occasional<BR>
errors in the use of verb tenses and moods do not detract from<BR>
understanding; word order and formation are mostly accurate.
Suggests Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is adequate; errors in<BR>
the use of verb tenses and moods may be frequent but do not detract<BR>
from overall understanding; word order and formation are generally<BR>
accurate.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is weak; errors in<BR>
verb forms, word order, and formation are numerous and serious<BR>
enough to impede comprehension at times.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is inadequate; errors<BR>
in verb forms, word order, and formation are nearly constant and<BR>
impede comprehension frequently.
Language Use- Writing Conventions
Demonstrates Superiority
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,<BR>
paragraphing) are generally accurate; paragraphing shows grouping<BR>
and progression of ideas.
Demonstrates Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,<BR>
paragraphing) are generally accurate; occasional errors do not detract<BR>
from understanding; paragraphing shows grouping and progression<BR>
of ideas.
Suggests Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,<BR>
paragraphing) are sometimes accurate; numerous errors do not<BR>
detract from overall understanding; paragraphing shows grouping<BR>
of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,<BR>
paragraphing) are generally inaccurate; errors are numerous and<BR>
serious enough to impede comprehension at times; paragraphing may<BR>
not show grouping of ideas.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,<BR>
paragraphing) are inaccurate; errors are nearly constant and impede<BR>
comprehension frequently; there may be little or no evidence<BR>
of paragraphing.
Keywords:
spanish literature text analysis
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.