Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Research Proposal Introduction rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Research Proposal Introduction
Research Proposal Introduction
The rubic is used to appraise the introductory research paper that specifies a topic of interest; identifies a problem; proposes a need for a study; formulates a research hypothesis and provides preliminary background data in the form of a review of literature.
Rubric Code:
GXX7529
By
Jeatlaw
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Health
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Introduction
Excellent
Well formulated introduction based on facts that are supported with 5 or more strong sources of evidence specific to the topic.
Good
Fairly well formulated introduction that has some evidence to support the topic but the evidence is a mixture of strong and weak sources.
fair
Introduction is not well constructed and provides a few (less than 5) sources of weak evidence to support the topic.
Poor
Lacks a proper introduction. There is no substantive evidence to support the topic
Problem Statement
Excellent
Very clearly posed statement of the problem and supported with high quality (strong) evidence.
Good
Fairly well posed statement of the problem that provides evidence but the evidence is not as strong as it could be.
fair
Statement of the problem is not clearly stated and/or lacks quality evidence to support the problem
Poor
Lacks a proper statement of the problem.
Evidence presented does not support the thesis or problem statement.
Purpose of Study
Excellent
Very clearly stated purpose of the study that connects very well to the introduction and the statement of the problem.
Good
Fairly well stated purpose of the study that connects well to the introduction and the statement of the problem.
fair
Purpose of the study is not clearly stated and/or does not connect well with the introduction and the statement of the problem.
Poor
Lacks a purpose of the study statement or does not pertain to the introduction and/or the statement of the problem.
Research Hypothesis
Excellent
Well stated research hypothesis based on the purpose of the study. Follows and meets all the guidelines for hypothesis development.
Good
Fairly well stated hypothesis based on the purpose of the study. Follows and meets greater than 80% of the guidelines for hypothesis development.
fair
Stated hypothesis is unclear based on the purpose of the study. Meets less than 80% of the guidelines for hypothesis development.
Poor
Lacks a hypothesis or the hypothesis presented does not support the purpose of the study. Fails to use the guidelines for hypothesis development.
Review of the literature
Excellent
Comprehensive review of the literature using quality evidence and specifically analyzes the research conducted by describing the individual studies and findings that support the thesis and focused problem. A minimum of 10 quality references included.
Good
Comprehensive review of the literature using quality evidence but does not adequately analyze the research findings; simply reports on the literature. A minimum of 8 quality references included.
fair
Superficial review of the literature that does not describe the research findings; relies heavily on a few studies and uses poor quality resources for information gathering Less than 8 quality references included.
Poor
Superficial review of the literature that is poorly organized and lacks credibility based on the level of evidence and resources presented. Less than 5 references included.
Writing Mechanics
Excellent
Very well written paper with few grammatical errors. Adheres to all the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Good
Well written paper with few grammatical errors. Adheres to most of the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
fair
Fairly written paper that lacks clarity; has poor transition sentences. There are several grammatical errors. Adheres to most of the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Poor
Poorly written paper that lacks organization. There are multiple grammatical errors. Fails to adhere to the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Keywords:
research proposal
Subjects:
Health
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Health rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.