Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: GRADE 9 LOGO DESIGN - ARTWORK STAGE rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
GRADE 9 LOGO DESIGN - ARTWORK STAGE
Conceiving a name for an imaginary product, product line, company, organization, etc. Several rough sketches are required for each of 4 different types of logos. Final full-page, full-colour artwork is required for each of 4 different types of logos.
Rubric Code:
GX774A
By
brenncommtech
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Logo Design Artwork
INCOMPLETE
(N/A)
L-1 (50-60%)
(N/A)
L-2 (61-72%)
(N/A)
L-3 (73-85%)
(N/A)
L-4 (86-100%)
(N/A)
MARK FOR THIS CRITERIA
(N/A)
COMMUNICATION
INCOMPLETE
Incomplete, not submitted or does not reflect task requirements.
Did not do all 4 logo types.
Did not participate in class discussions or distracted others from their work.
L-1 (50-60%)
Participated in some of the discussions.
Logos show lack of connections in terms of what is being communicated visually. Graphics are not well related to the product/firm.
L-2 (61-72%)
Participated satisfactorily.
Logos show some basic connections between what is seen and the nature of the product or company.
L-3 (73-85%)
Participated actively in relevant class discussions. Made a very good attempt to connect visual messages to the subject. A variety of ideas are communicated effectively.
L-4 (86-100%)
Student expressed self very effectively in discussion, rough work and final work.
Connections are well thought-out, showing much effort and creative expression.
MARK FOR THIS CRITERIA
APPLICATION
INCOMPLETE
Incomplete, not submitted or does not reflect task requirements.
Did not do all 4 logo types.
Did not use time wisely. Talked off-topic more than he/she worked.
L-1 (50-60%)
Underdeveloped. Not enough rough sketches. Missed important assignment task(s).
Lack of or inadequate use of colour. Final logos are messy and show lack of care.
L-2 (61-72%)
Logos are acceptably attractive, although a bit messy.
Colour is used inconsistently.
Some care and attention to detail is shown. All assignment tasks are complete.
L-3 (73-85%)
Logos are well developed, attractive, detailed and neat. Strong variation between different logo types shows effort in application. Colours used effectively.
L-4 (86-100%)
Logos are exceptional and appear professional. Student took time and care to produce exemplary work. Applied knowledge from lessons related to balance, layout, colours and style.
MARK FOR THIS CRITERIA
THINKING & INQUIRY
INCOMPLETE
Incomplete, not submitted or does not reflect task requirements.
Did not do all 4 logo types.
T/I process was extremely limited.
L-1 (50-60%)
Designs show very limited thought given to various project tasks. Designs are too similar to one another; lack of inquiry inhibited creativity.
L-2 (61-72%)
Limited thought and inquiry given to design process. Some success was shown in a few of the designs, but not all of them were followed-through. Creative process - satisfactory.
L-3 (73-85%)
Good insight shown into the creative design process. Thought given to style, relationships and variety of designs.
L-4 (86-100%)
In-process and final work is outstandingly creative and complex. Insight is well focused and shows a great deal of effort.
MARK FOR THIS CRITERIA
KNOWLEDGE & UNDERST.
INCOMPLETE
Incomplete, not submitted or does not reflect task requirements.
Did not do all 4 logo types.
Student does not know different types of logos.
L-1 (50-60%)
Work shows a great deal of confusion regarding the different logo types and basic design principles.
Assignment tasks were not well understood.
L-2 (61-72%)
Work shows a satisfactory, but limited or fundamental understanding of logo types, design principles and assignment tasks.
L-3 (73-85%)
Progressive knowledge and understanding demonstrated throughout the design process. Good attempt shown to integrate learning into design work.
L-4 (86-100%)
Knowledge and understanding of all aspects of the assignment as well as design principles is shown clearly through submitted work.
MARK FOR THIS CRITERIA
Subjects:
Communication
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.