Skip to main content

iRubric: To-Scale Model Set Design rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
To-Scale Model Set Design 
preparation and finalization of to-scale model set for a proscenium stage
Rubric Code: GX2A45B
By tpohlhaus
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric To-Scale Model Set Design
  Excellent (A)

5 pts

Good (B)

4 pts

Fair (C)

3 pts

Needs Imp. (D)

2 pts

Poor (F)

1 pts

Story Plot Summary

-Covers the whole story (beginning, middle, end)
Excellent (A)

Plot summary was very clear and concise and included all necessary details to understand the story's plot, style, and mood.
Good (B)

Plot summary was clear and concise and included most of the necessary details to understand the story.
Fair (C)

Plot summary was mostly clear and concise and included some of the details needed to understand the story.
Needs Imp. (D)

Plot summary was sometimes clear and concise, but was missing some key details needed to understand the story.
Poor (F)

Plot summary was unclear; it was difficult to understand the story because many key details were missing.
Setting Description

-describes ONE setting of story (Character POV)
-NOT describing the stage
Excellent (A)

Setting description was very detailed and appropriate to the story.
(material, placement, color, size, shape, style, etc...)
Good (B)

Setting description was detailed and appropriate to the story.
Fair (C)

Setting description was adequate and appropriate to the story.
Needs Imp. (D)

Setting description was at times unclear, but was appropriate to the story.
Poor (F)

Setting description was unclear and/or not fitting for the story.
Set Design Rendering

Excellent (A)

Drawing was exceptionally neat, colorful, and creative. It showed a great picture of what the audience would see.
Good (B)

Drawing was neat, colorful, and creative. It showed a good picture of what the audience would see.
Fair (C)

Drawing was somewhat neat and creative. It showed a good picture of what the audience would see.
Needs Imp. (D)

Drawing was a bit sloppy. It showed vague idea of what the audience would see.
Poor (F)

Drawing was messy. It didn't give a good idea of what the audience would see.
List of Req'd Set Pieces

-incorporate details
and levels onstage
-use appropriate set piece terms
Excellent (A)

More than enough required set pieces were included in the list. Setting and mood were clear, and details were added to engage the audience.
Good (B)

Enough required set pieces were included in the list to suggest setting and mood. A few details were included to engage the audience.
Fair (C)

Enough set pieces were included in the list that would make setting clear to the audience
Needs Imp. (D)

Some required set pieces were included in the list, but elements of the setting were unclear.
Poor (F)

Many key set pieces were missing from the list and setting is unclear.
List of Measurements

-completeness and detail of pieces
Excellent (A)

List of measurements was complete and detailed for all set pieces.
Good (B)

List of measurements was complete for all set pieces.
Fair (C)

List of measurements was mostly complete; but a few details of set pieces were missing.
Needs Imp. (D)

List of measurements was partially complete.
Poor (F)

List of measurements was incomplete.
List of Measurements

-accuracy of onstage measurements and scaled conversions
Excellent (A)

Stage measurements were carefully thought out and appropriate to the design.

Scaled measurements were always accurate.
Good (B)

Stage measurements were appropriate to the design.

Scaled conversions were mostly accurate.
Fair (C)

Stage measurements were usually appropriate to the design.

Scaled measurements were sometimes accurate.
Needs Imp. (D)

Stage measurements were sometimes appropriate to the design.

Scaled measurements were rarely accurate.
Poor (F)

Stage measurements were rarely appropriate to the design.

Scaled measurements were inaccurate.
3-D Model

-Neatness of construction
Excellent (A)

Model was exceptionally attractive. It was appropriately colorful, very neat, detailed, and interesting to look at.
Good (B)

Model was attractive. It was appropriately colorful, neat, and nice to look at.
Fair (C)

Model was fairly attractive. It was slightly colorful, but was a little bit messy in some spots.
Needs Imp. (D)

Model needed improvement. It was not appropriately colored, and was messy in many places.
Poor (F)

Model was unattractive. It did not incorporate color and was very messy.
3-D Model

-Accuracy of scaled construction
Excellent (A)

Model was carefully measured and constructed and accurately showed relative scale of set pieces.
Good (B)

Model was measured and showed close to relative scale for all set pieces.
Fair (C)

Model showed some signs of measurement, but did not appear to be properly scaled in a few places.
Needs Imp. (D)

Model shows few signs of measurement, and many set pieces were inappropriately scaled.
Poor (F)

Model does not show any signs of measurement. Set pieces were inappropriately scaled.
3-D Model

-Creativity in design and use of materials
Excellent (A)

Model showed exceptional creativity. Ideas used to create the model were innovative and interesting.
Good (B)

Model showed good creativity. Ideas used to create the model were interesting.
Fair (C)

Model showed a fair level of creativity. There were quite a few creative ideas used to create the model.
Needs Imp. (D)

Model showed a small amount of creativity. There were 1 or 2 creative ideas used to create the model.
Poor (F)

Model showed little to no creativity. Ideas used to create the model were bland and uninteresting.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178