Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: W200 Case Artifact - Spring 2014 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
W200 Case Artifact - Spring 2014
W200 Case Artifact - Fall 2013
Note: this rubric applies to both of your case artifacts.
Rubric Code:
GC2735
By
educw200student
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Entirety
Missing
0 pts
Incomplete
3 pts
Poor
6 pts
Fair
9 pts
Good
12 pts
Excellent
15 pts
Entirety
Missing
No submission.
Incomplete
Incomplete
Poor
The artifact does not demonstrate an ability to create usable teacher and student materials.
Materials are missing vital components, and show a misunderstanding of the instructional goals and context.
Fair
The artifact demonstrated your ability to creat teacher and student materials, but the materials contain errors, or are missing some needed components.
The artifact does not demonstrate a full understanding of the instructional goals and/or context.
Good
The artifact demonstrates your ability to create teacher and student materials that can be used during the lesson.
The artifact demonstrated an understanding of the instructional goals and context.
Excellent
The artifact serves as a demonstration of your ability to create everything the teachers and students would need to successfully complete the entire lesson.
The artifact demonstrates a complete understanding of the instructional goal and context, and addresses both through its design.
Content and Technology Use
Missing
0 pts
Incomplete
2 pts
Poor
4 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Artifacts #1
Appropriateness
Missing
No submission.
Incomplete
Incomplete.
Poor
The artifact is inappropriate for the needs and the standards of the case, owing to error or misunderstanding of the problem.
Fair
There are one or two points showing its appropriateness, but the artifact is somewhat inappropriate for the needs and the standards of the case.
Good
The artifact is appropriate for the needs and the standards of the case, but may not be entirely appropriate for the needs of the case.
Excellent
The artifact is appropriate for both the needs and the standards of the case.
The artifact could be used as a model of how to fulfill the assignment.
Academic Content
Missing
No submission.
Incomplete
Incomplete
Poor
The artifact fails to address the academic content needed to address the problem.
The content is not very usable, and poorly communicated.
Fair
The artifact generally addresses the academic content needed, but does not completely address the problem.
The content is usable for the lesson.
Good
The artifact contains nearly all the academic content needed to address the problem.
The content is usuable for the lesson, and communicated in a fairly clear manner.
Excellent
The artifact contains all of the academic content needed to address the problem.
The content is usable for teaching the lesson, and communicated clearly and effectively.
Technology Use
Missing
No submission.
Incomplete
Incomplete
Poor
The artifcat uses technology in ways that are irrelevant to the needs of the case.
Instructions are generally unclear.
Fair
The artifact does not use technology in an effective manner.
Instructions are somewhat unclear.
Good
The artifact effectively uses technology to address the needs of the case.
Instructions pertaining to technology are fairly clear.
Excellent
The artifact uses technology in a way that maximizes the technology's ability to address the needs of the case.
Instructions pertaining to the technology are communicated clearly and effectively.
Artifacts #2
Appropriateness
Missing
No submission.
Incomplete
Incomplete
Poor
The artifact is inappropriate for the needs and the standards of the case, owing to error or misunderstanding of the problem.
Fair
There are one or two points showing its appropriateness, but the artifact is somewhat inappropriate for the needs and the standards of the case.
Good
The artifact is appropriate for the needs and the standards of the case, but may not be entirely appropriate for the needs of the case.
Excellent
The artifact is perfectly appropriate for the needs and the standards of the case. The artifact coThe artifact is appropriate for both the needs and the standards of the case.
The artifact could be used as a model of how to fulfill the assignment.uld be used as a model of how to fulfill the assignment.
Academic Content
Missing
No submission.
Incomplete
Incomplete
Poor
The artifact fails to address the academic content needed to address the problem.
The content is not very usable, and poorly communicated.
Fair
The artifact generally addresses the academic content needed, but does not completely address the problem.
The content is usable for the lesson.
Good
The artifact contains nearly all the academic content needed to address the problem.
The content is usuable for the lesson, and communicated in a fairly clear manner.
Excellent
The ACADEMIC CONTENT in your artifact is peThe artifact contains all of the academic content needed to address the problem.
The content is usable for teaching the lesson, and communicated clearly and effectively.rfectly complete, polished, and professional. This should actually be usable for teaching the lesson. The student has made good decisions about academic content to communicate clearly and effectively.
Technology Use
Missing
No submission.
Incomplete
Incomplete
Poor
The artifcat uses technology in ways that are irrelevant to the needs of the case.
Instructions are generally unclear.
Fair
The artifact does not use technology in an effective manner.
Instructions are somewhat unclear.
Good
The artifact effectively uses technology to address the needs of the case.
Instructions pertaining to technology are fairly clear.
Excellent
The artifact uses technology in a way that maximizes the technology's ability to address the needs of the case.
Instructions pertaining to the technology are communicated clearly and effectively.
Instructions pertaining to the technology are communicated clearly and effectively. oducts themselves and walkthroughs).
Subjects:
Education
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.