iRubric: Design Your Own City: Map project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Design Your Own City: Map project Design Your Own City: Map project Rubric Code: G89W8C By Aaronjchan Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Geography Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Design Your Own City
	4 (N/A)	3 (N/A)	2 (N/A)	1 (N/A)	R (N/A)
City Name and Population	4 The city has a unique name. The population is listed on the project. Both are shown creatively on the project.	3 The city has a name. The population is listed on the project.	2 Either the city name or the population is missing.	1 The city has a name and population but are not on the project.	R The city does not have a name. The city population is not identified.
Streets and Street Names	4 The city features multiple types of streets and are laid out in a well organized fashion.	3 The city features parallel and perpendicular (grid) streets. Streets are named.	2 The city does feature parallel and perpendicular (grid) streets. Streets are not named.	1 The city features streets that are confusing to follow.	R The city does not feature streets.
Buildings	4 The city includes more than the required buildings.	3 The city includes all of the required buildings.	2 The city includes 10 or few of the required buildings	1 The city includes 5 or fewer of the required buildings.	R This map does not include landmarks.
Mass Transit System	4 The mass transit system is unique to the city and connects all parts of the city efficiently with clearly marked areas.	3 The mass transit system connects all parts of the city and is clearly marked.	2 The mass transit system connects all parts of the city but is not clearly identifiable.	1 The mass transit system is not clearly marked and does not connect parts of the city.	R No mass transit system.
Written Component	4 The written component was handed in with complete explanations and details that explained all aspects of the answers.	3 The written component was handed in with full explanations.	2 The written component was handed in but lacked detail and explanations.	1 Part of the written component was handed in.	R Written component was not handed in.
Attractiveness	4 The design and the construction of the project looks like it was very carefully created. The project is exceptionally attractive in terms of layout and neatness.	3 The design and construction of the project looks carefully created, and is attractive in terms of layout and neatness with very few flaws	2 The design and construction of the project has several flaws. Some parts are not well done. The project is attractive though a bit messy.	1 The design and construction of the project was poorly created. The project is distractingly messy or very poorly designed.	R Very poorly done or not turned in.