Skip to main content
iRubric: CDFS 4790: Content Presentation rubric

iRubric: CDFS 4790: Content Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CDFS 4790: Content Presentation 
CDFS 4790: Content Presentation
Group presentation on an assigned chapter from the text along with added information from their project. Presentations should be no longer than 12-15 minutes and all group members shoudl participate in presenting the requeset informatoin.
Rubric Code: G87CB3
By drZ_Man2012
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Content Presentation
  Poor

1 pts

Adequate

3 pts

Good

7 pts

Excellent

9 pts

Overall aesthetics

Visual appeal
Poor

Background makes the presentation hard to read. Graphics are confusing and not related to words. Too much movement in the slides. Many slides hard to read.
Adequate

There are too few graphic elements. Appropriate background. Some slides are hard to read.
Good

Appealing graphic elements are included appropriately. Slides are readable, but wordy. Annimations are used, but are sometimes distracting.
Excellent

Appealing graphic elements are included appropriately. Slides are easy to read and annimations are used effectively.
Mechanics

Grammar, spelling, and formatting
Poor

There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is not consistent or clear. Too much information on many slides.
Adequate

There are some (4-5) errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is not consistent on a few slides. Too much information on four or more slides.
Good

There are infrequent (1-2) errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is consistent on all slides. Too much information on two or more slides.
Excellent

There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Bullets are consistent and clear. Information is clear and concise on each slide.
Presentation skills

Group working to deliver presentation.
Poor

Two or more of the presenters didn't know the information and got lost often. Diction and voice level made listening difficult. Presnters read all their notes and fail to make eye contact with audience.
Adequate

One presenter didn't know the information and they got lost often. Diction and voice level made listening difficult for the audience. Presenters mostly read notes and make infrequent eye contact with audience.
Good

All presnters knew the information and only got lost on occassion. Diction and voice level made listening easy for the audience. Presenters mostly maintained eye contact with the audience, and referenced their notes on occasion.
Excellent

All presenters knew the information and progressed smoothly through the presentation. Diction and voice level engaged the audience in the presentation. Presenters maintain eye contact with audience, seldom returneing to their notes.
Expert Connections

Accuracy and application of information
Poor

Information presented is entirely inaccruate. No examples are given to help audience members apply terms and concepts.
Adequate

Information presented is somewhat accurate. A few examples are given to help audience members apply terms and concepts.
Good

Information presented is entirely accurate. Presenters offer many examples and often elborate on, extend, and explain information to audience members.
Excellent

Information presented is entirely accurate. Presenters have demonstrated the meaning of material by correctly ebloarting, extending and explaining information to audience members.
Facts and Information

Depth of topic area information
Poor

The topic area was presented without focus. Very little information on the history of the topic area and current issues in the topic area. Failed to present the relation between the topic area and program proposal topic.
Adequate

There was adequate information about the topic area. Basic info on the history of the topic area, and current issues in the topic area. Relation between the topic area and program proposal topic was weak.
Good

Good information on the history of the topic area and current issues in the topic area, but some areas deserved further attention. The relation between the topic area and program proposal topic was clear.
Excellent

Comprehensive information on the history of the topic area and current issues in the topic area. The relation between the topic area and program proposal topic was clear and strong.
Group Facilitating Skills

Poor

Presenters do not have grasp of information; presenters cannot answer questions about subject matter.
Adequate

Presenters are at ease with expected answers to most questions, but fail to elaborate on question answers.
Good

Presenters are at ease with expected answers to most quetions and ellobrate on most question answers.
Excellent

Presenters demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Presentation Lenght
  Poor

1 pts

Adequate

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Length of presentation

Poor

Presentation was within 5 minutes of the range for appropriate length.
Adequate

Presentation was within 2 minutes of the range for appropriate length.
Good

Presentation was within 1 minute of the range for appropriate length
Excellent

Presentation was within range for appropriate length.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232