Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Oral Presentation- Book Report 3 (Review) due 10/25 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Oral Presentation- Book Report 3 (Review) due 10/25
Oral Presentation- Book Report 2 due 10/7
Students will give a short presentation to the class on their reading book of at least 200 pages, including bibliographic information in MLA format on a note card. Students will demonstrate understanding of the terms studied in class, giving examples (w/ p#) of both sensory imagery and figurative language. Students will also discuss point of view, genre, and explain elements of plot structure including conflict, exposition, inciting force, rising action, crisis, climax, falling action, and resolution. Students will explain if the text begins 'in medias res' or 'ab ovo', uses foreshadowing (cite example and include p#), makes use of flashbacks (cite example and include p#), or follows a completely linear time line. Finally, students will explain why they would or wouldn't recommend the book to other students. Students are required to hand in this self-graded rubric before their presentation on Monday, October 25. 10 points will be deducted for students who lose this rubric.
Rubric Code:
G46AX8
By
kimvdb
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Oral Book Report
Excellent
25 pts
Good
23 pts
Average
20 pts
Poor
18 pts
Bibliographic Info
Excellent
-all required bibliographic information in proper MLA format on note card
-has book to show class
-has lexile level of book which is at or above student's own lexile level
Good
-one bibliographic element missing or one mistake in format on note card
-lacks book's lexile level or book is not at or above student's own lexile level
Average
-two or three bibliographic elements missing or mistakes in format; not written on note card
- lacks book's lexile level
Poor
-four or more bibliographic elements missing or mistakes in format; not on note card
-lacks book's lexile level
Content Review from Presentation 1
Excellent
-presentation is clear,
logical, and organized
-all information is
presented: genre, point of view, sensory imagery (with page number) and figurative language (with page number
-thorough understanding
of content and terms
Good
-presentation is
generally clear,
logical, and organized
-considerable
information is
presented but lacking one requirement
-demonstrates
understanding of content and terms
Average
-presentation is
sometimes clear and logical
-quality indicates insufficient preparation
-some information is presented, but lacking two or three requirements
-some understanding of content and terms
Poor
-presentation lacks
clarity
-poorly prepared
-limited information is
presented, lacking more than three requirements of assignment
-weak understanding of content and terms
Content Review from Presentation 2
Excellent
-presentation is clear,
logical, and organized
-all information on plot structure is
presented, including foreshadowing (page number) and/or flashbacks (page numbers)
-thorough understanding
of content and terms
Good
-presentation is
generally clear,
logical, and organized
-considerable
information is
presented but lacking one requirement
-demonstrates
understanding of content and terms
Average
-presentation is
sometimes clear and logical
-quality indicates insufficient preparation
-some information is presented, but lacking two or three requirements
-some understanding of content and terms
Poor
-presentation lacks
clarity
-poorly prepared
-limited information is
presented, lacking more than three requirements of assignment
-weak understanding of content and terms
Recommendation
Excellent
-convincingly supports recommendation, explaining why they did or did not enjoy the book, including a text-to-self, text-to-text or text-to-world connection
Good
-convincingly supports recommendation with explanation
Average
-recommendation is explained inadequately
Poor
-no explanation offered for recommendation
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.