Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Case Study Wiki - Part I rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Case Study Wiki - Part I
Case Study Wiki - Part I
This is a rubric for the initial response to a case study.
Rubric Code:
G44B2C
By
rtrombly
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Case Study - Part I
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Wiki Content
Content
Poor
Minimal or missing content, 3 or more factual errors.
No details or examples.
Fair
Demonstrates essentialknowledge however contains 1 -2 factual errors.
Very few details or examples.
Good
Demonstrates essential knowledge with no factual errors.
Some details and examples.
Excellent
Demonstrates in-depth knowledge.
Many details and examples.
Organization
Poor
Content has no logical organization.
Fair
Content has some logical organization.
Good
Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize topics.
Excellent
Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize topis and group related material.
Analysis of the Problem
Poor
No information related to the central issues in the case or the decisions that need to be made are presented. The introduction does not show an understanding of the case.
Fair
Little information is provided related to the issues in the case or the decisions that need to be made.
Good
The general information relatd to the central issues in the case are included. The decision(s) that need to be made are not clear. Little direction is given to the reader to understand the organization of how the response will be presented.
Excellent
Introduction to the case study clearly articulates the central issues in the case. The decision(s) that need to made are clearly stated. The oganization of how the response will be presented is also included.
Outlines Available Options
Poor
Only one idea was presented. No additional options were presented in response to the case.
Fair
Only two options were preseted and demonstrated minor evidence of original thinking.
Good
Shows evidence of some critical thought. At least three plausible options were presented and each option included an anylsis of the positive and negative aspects. Little reference was provided related to the additional data needed to make a decision.
Excellent
Many original ideas linked to topic and material. More than three plausible options were presented and each option clearly outlined the postiive and negative aspects. A discussion regarding what additional data would be needed for the decision process was also included.
Final Response
Poor
It isn't clear what the final response. No additional information on how the final decision will be operationalized into practice is presented.
Fair
The final response is not clear and includes elements of multiple options. How the decision was made to go with this course of action is not clear. The plan for implementation is not clear.
Good
The final response is one of the options provided. Little additional information is provided to show how this response will be implemented.
Excellent
The final response is clear and one of the options provided. A clear explanation of how the response will be put into action is provided and a rational for your final decision is included.
Citation: APA
Poor
Copies material without citing sources.
Fair
Does not give credit to most sources.
Uses improper format for citing sources.
Good
Gives credit to most sources.
Uses proper format for citing format with minor errors.
Excellent
Gives credit to all sources.
Uses proper format for citing sources.
Collaboration
Contribution
Poor
Did not contribute the development of the response for the case.
No contribution or minimal input to development of the wiki.
Fair
Minimal participation was represented toward the response provided. Showed little contribution toward the final response.
Moderate input to development of wiki.
Good
Basic development of ideas on the issue.
Adequate input to development of wiki.
Excellent
Contributed a great deal of information and blended their own ideas on topic with others to come up with a response.
Constant input to development of wiki.
Authorship
Poor
Does not create any content or edit anyone else's responses within the case.
Fair
Contributes to the creation of one part of the content.
Only submits one change/suggestion to other aspects within the case response.
Good
Contributes to the creation of two aspects of the content.
Makes changes/suggestions to two to three other aspects within the case response.
Excellent
Contributes to the creation of more than two aspects of the content.
Makes changes/suggestions to more than three other aspects within the case response.
Keywords:
wiki
Subjects:
Computers
Education
Types:
Project
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.