Skip to main content
iRubric: Digital Film Shifting Portfolio rubric

iRubric: Digital Film Shifting Portfolio rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Digital Film Shifting Portfolio 
A rubric to assess the quality of portfolios and sample works submitted by students wishing to shift into the Digital Filmmaking Program.
Rubric Code: FXW4AC3
By jaggarcia
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric BenildeFilm Shifting Portfolio
A rubric to assess the quality of portfolios and sample works submitted by students wishing to shift into the Digital Filmmaking Program.

Please be informed that an applicant must garner a % equivalent of 75% to be accepted into the Program.
  Weak

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Strong

3 pts

Notable

4 pts

Volume
10 %

The number and range of the applicant's submitted works
Weak

Applicant submitted 1-2 works of almost identical type with no range of style, format and/or themes
Fair

Applicant submitted 2-4 works of generally the same type or genre; there is little or no range in the style, format and/or themes
Strong

Applicant submitted at least 3 works showing a range of styles, formats and/or themes
Notable

Applicant's works show a range of style, formats, and themes; works show evidence of the applicant's understanding of the medium as creative and/or communication tool
History
15 %

The span of time and purpose covering the applicant's body of work
Weak

Applicant's sample work was produced in the very recent past or specifically for the shifting process
Fair

Applicant's sample work was produced in the past 3 months as part of an academic requirement
Strong

Applicant's sample works have been produced over the span of more than 3 months for either academic or non-academic purposes
Notable

Applicant's sample works have been produced over the span of more than 6 months and for non-academic purposes or competitions
Role & Participation
15 %

The role the applicant takes in the creation or development of the projects in the body of work
Weak

Applicant does not take key creative or leadership roles in the works; works barely or do not show evidence of the applicant taking an active part in the creative process.
Fair

Applicant is seen in various roles or contexts throughout the body of work; works show evidence of the applicant participating in the creative process.
Strong

Applicant is usually in a lead creative and/or leadership role as director, producer, and/or writer; works show evidence of the applicant taking active part in the creative process.
Notable

Applicant is always in a lead creative and/or leadership role as director, producer, and/or writer; works show evidence of the applicant taking active control of the creative process.
Technical Quality
30 %

The physical quality and appearance of the applicant's body of work
Weak

Applicant's sample works show almost no consideration for technical aspects such as lighting, sound, and editing; works show rough execution of technique
Fair

Applicant's sample works show some consideration for technical aspects such as lighting, sound, and editing; works show evidence of maximizing available resources
Strong

Applicant's sample works show a conscious regard for technical aspects such as lighting, sound, and editing; works show evidence of maximizing available resources by improvisation, experimentation, and/ or ingenuity
Notable

Applicant's sample works are technically clean and polished, well lit, and properly mixed; works may also show utilization of advanced techniques such as color grading or visual effects
Aesthetic Quality
30 %

The creative quality or evidence of creativity of the applicant's body of work
Weak

Applicant's sample works attempt to apply common techniques of storytelling, composition, and/or aesthetic design; work is a poor execution of a formula or genre
Fair

Applicant's sample works apply common techniques of storytelling, composition, and/or aesthetic design; work is typical for the formula or genre
Strong

Applicant's sample works show a conscious application of storytelling, compositional, and/or aesthetic technique; works try to break away from typical formulas and techniques
Notable

Applicant's sample works show an early mastery of storytelling, composition, and aesthetic design; works show evidence of edginess, freshness, novelty, and/or experimentation





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232