iRubric: SOAP note rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
SOAP note A summative assessment tool for clinical SOAP notes Rubric Code: FXB88AW By chase123 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Graduate

Enter rubric title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Professional Language	Poor More than two grammatical or punctuation errors, informal terms, first person language, passive voice.	Fair One or two grammatical or punctuation errors, informal terms, first person language, passive voice.	Good No instances of grammatical or punctuation errors, informal terms, first person language, passive voice.
Completeness	Poor More than one area of the following is insufficient: Subjective section contains only clinical observation or client/parent statements, all objective areas are addressed, assessment statement is comparative and is supported by the subjective and objective information presented prior, the plan reflects analysis of the data.	Fair Any one area of the following is insufficient: Subjective section contains only clinical observation or client/parent statements, all objective areas are addressed, assessment statement is comparative and is supported by the subjective and objective information presented prior, the plan reflects analysis of the data.	Good Subjective section contains only clinical observation or client/parent statements, all objective areas are addressed, assessment statement is comparative and is supported by the subjective and objective information presented prior, the plan reflects analysis of the data.
Clarity	Poor Any of the following: Note is moderately unclear overall, requires re-reading to comprehend, points are not logically sequenced, unnecessary words or comments interrupt flow, meaning of assessment and plan are unclear.	Fair Any of the following: note is mildly unclear overall, requires re-reading to comprehend, points are not logically sequenced, unnecessary words or comments interrupt flow, meaning of assessment and plan are unclear.	Good Note is easy to read, does not require the reader to re-read in order to understand. Flow is logical from point to point and meaning of assessment and plan are evident.