Skip to main content

iRubric: FORMAL LAB REPORT rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
FORMAL LAB REPORT 
FORMAL LAB REPORT
Students will create a formal lab report for the STEM Fair Project
Rubric Code: FXB57WA
By jnadeau
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric FORMAL LAB REPORT
  Outstanding

0.5 pts

Satisfactory

0.4 pts

Needs Work

0.3 pts

Poor

0.2 pts

Title

Outstanding

Title is brief and clearly related to the main point of the investigation.
Satisfactory

Title is written but is not clearly related to the main point of investigation.
Needs Work

Title is written but has nothing to do with the main point of the investigation.
Poor

Title missing
FORMAL LAB REPORT
  Outstanding

0.5 pts

Satisfactory

0.4 pts

Needs work

0.3 pts

Poor

0.2 pts

Introduction

Outstanding

Purpose is clearly stated. Hypothesis is clearly stated. Background information from cited sources is present
Satisfactory

Purpose and hypothesis are clearly stated but no background information is presented.
Needs work

Purpose is stated, but there is not an hypothesis or background information.
Poor

Introduction is missing
Materials and Mehtods

Outstanding

All lab materials are listed, and methods are written in complete sentences. Enough detail is given so a reader could duplicate the study.
Satisfactory

Materials and methods are listed, but not in full sentences and without enough detail so a reader could duplicate study
Needs work

Some materials and methods are listed, but a reader would have a hard time duplicating the study.
Poor

Materials and methods section is missing
Results

Outstanding

Results are clearly conveyed (e.g. graph). Also, results are correct.
Satisfactory

Results are not correct or clearly stated.
Needs work

Many parts of the result section are missing or not correct.
Poor

The results of the investigation are missing.
FORMAL LAB REPORT
  Outstanding

0.5 pts

Satisfactory

0.4 pts

Needs Work

0.3 pts

Poor

0.2 pts

Discussion/Conclusion

Outstanding

Hypothesis is clearly stated whether it was supported or rejected by results. If supported specific results are cited. If rejected 1 or more explanations why are given. Exceptions and confusing results are discussed, including sources of errors.
Satisfactory

Clear statement of hypothesis support or rejection is not stated. No explanation of why is given. No sources of error or confusing results are given.
Needs Work

Conclusion of the investigation was given, but there was no clear statement of hypothesis support or rejection, nor no discussion of the conclusion of the experiment.
Poor

Discussion is missing
APA Format

Outstanding

Separate Title page and Reference page. Format of the lab is properly formatted. Spelling and grammar are at grade level.
Satisfactory

Separate Title page and Reference page. Some minor errors in APA format. Spelling and grammar are at grade level.
Needs Work

Missing Title page OR Reference page. Major errors in APA formatting. Spelling and grammar not at grade level.
Poor

Missing Title page and reference page. Major errors in APA formatting. Spelling and grammar not at grade level.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202